Wikipedia talk:Administrators without tools
Page contents not supported in other languages.
![]() | Essays Low‑impact ![]() | |||||||||
|
Very nice page. Seems like a constructive way to help the RfA situation.
Actually, when I read the reference to RfA reform, I thought the mop template had something to do with it. Then I thought that'd be kind of cool: if new admins were selected by people placing mops on the talk pages of people they admire. Maybe you limit people to, say, one mop every 12 months, and still have a panel to screen those selected.
But it'd rely far less on a small panel and more on a process where everyone says to themselves, "Ok, now who's the best editor I've seen all year?"
--Qwerty0 (talk) 10:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw this show up on a few user talk pages I have watchlisted. It isn't a bad idea, I'll be curious to see how it develops. But three pieces of feedback:
--Floquenbeam (talk) Floquenbeam (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would consider also offering them a link to RFAADVICE for them to think it over. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was: Moved - FlightTime (open channel) 00:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC) (closed by non-admin page mover)[reply]
– Current title is unclear and doesn't make much sense. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 22:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]