User talk:NE2/Archive 15
Page contents not supported in other languages.
See here. Hope that's OK. Feel free to archive the pun somewhere if you want. Carcharoth (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit (http:https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/index.php?lang=en&q=List_of_highways_numbered_19A&diff=220028074&oldid=219947338) broke a few of the links. Rather than revert, I thought I might let you know, since you state that links on DABs should not contain piped text. However, as this page is both a list page and a DAB, perhaps this doesn't apply?DigitalC (talk) 05:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NE2, I'm 99.9% sure you are mistaken about modern Utah State Route 30 being part of the Midland Trail. For starters, US-6 in CA and NV is signed as the midland trail, and per everything I've ever seen it used the same route as the Lincoln highway form Ely, NV to Salt Lake, this is well over 150 miles south of where SR-30 flows. How would it get from Ely, to Montello? Also IMO it is very inappropriate to knowingly use dead links for sources, which was done with the most recent additions.Dave (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently looking for mileages for I-29 in ND. Where in the North Dakota DOT site would we be able to find the logs containing the mileages for I-29? Dabby (talk) 05:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I found a page containing mileages rounded to the nearest thousandth. However it only lists four interchanges. I left the mileage notes on Talk:Interstate 29 in North Dakota. Dabby (talk) 05:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Found the source for mileages. Thanks! Dabby (talk) 02:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have 15 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Why did you change the category from Defunct Municipalities in New Jersey to Former towns in New Jersey? 98.221.133.96 (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, me again. I'm not a deletionist by any means, but I find the category pages you created to be a bit misleading. You see, if a municipality renames itself from town to city, or borough to town, that's not quite the same thing as becoming defunct. Defunct municipalities no longer exist, hence the term defunct. I find the pages you created to actually be a bit ambiguous and unneeded, as defunct municipalites are listed with municipalites that still exist but have retitled themselves. I New Jersey, official municipal titles are irrelevant, but more importantly, the list doesn't specify which municipalities are defunct and which have retitled themselves. 98.221.133.96 (talk) 17:25, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record, I'm on your side regarding whether U.S. Route 27 Alternate (Florida) should be kept. That road is 94 miles long, and if this can be redirected, so can articles on other bannered routes with more detail. ----DanTD (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Same here. You noticed that I restored it. Dabby (talk) 23:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I passed it without really reading the section, but if its really necessary - comment on WT:GAN, maybe some kind of conclusion can be made there.Mitch32 19:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
To find control cities of specific highway what source to find. Because, i don't find a source list highways specific control cities. I'm trying to see if SR 19 (Rosemead Blvd.) actually have officially control cities, and what about SR 39? I know I can't make up cities, I do see some epople doing that.--Freewayguy Msg USC 23:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Did you originally put purple (merge) tag on I-105? And why did you merge OR 126 with i-15. I-105 in OR is an existing route.--Freewayguy Msg USC 00:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should we keep it merge with I-405. The whole alignment San Diego Frwy is I-405, and i-5 is the southern half. Don't San Diego Frwy have similar history and landmarks with i-405?--Freewayguy Msg USC 00:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Golden State Frwy, this one I don't think it can be merge, becasue it has its own landmark.--Freewayguy Msg USC 00:56, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I responded to your comments on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Interstate Highways in New York. Cheers, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you get the photos for the exit list? I checked AARoads; it only goes from the South Dakota state line to the vicinity of Fargo. I tried StarOwl's Highway Heaven to finish up the rest of the exit list. Although StarOwl's Highway Heaven was not a reliable source, it was only the best source I could find. What visual photos did you use to clean up the list? Dabby (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, your expansion looks good (as always). And when I saw the bluelinks for SR-900 and 901, I almost had a heart attack, never expecting those two to have articles (they don't even have shields), but then I saw they were only redirects. Well, a bluelink is a bluelink. :D CL — 07:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What is the largest highway in the world? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 05:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw this over summer; the green guide displays I-110/SR-110 on Four level interchange. It will be better if we keep I-110 article just on harbor Frwy, and Pasadena Frwy only on its info.--Freewayguy Msg USC 16:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You never even been on Four Level Interchange; and what you mean by I'm forgetting aboout surface part in San Pedro. harbor and Pasadena Frwys I thoguht is distinctive; their histories is a little different. pasadena Frwy is built in the 1950s; Harbor Frwy is built 5 to 10 years later.--Freewayguy Msg USC 17:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you asnwer this first?--Freewayguy Msg USC 19:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I dont understand your meaning by I'm forgetting abiut surface part.--Freewayguy Msg USC 19:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | On 30 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Utah State Route 196, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do we have a valid source of Hollywood Split? I dug through Googel, and Yahoo I couldn't find any.--Freewayguy Msg USC 02:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the last section of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. counties for the reason for including county templates in county categories. Nyttend (talk) 12:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does alternate name needs to be mention on every intersections. I've been on the 605 quite many times and Green plates outside just say I-605 north or South THru Traffic; from anothr Frwy interchange lie I-5 or 405 they just say I-605 Frwy North; South without control city. Now Green plates don't post alternate names so often; even now on Four Level Interchange from Hollywood (US 101) Frwy; they just say I-110 South to San pedro; SR-110 North to Pasadena, same as Santa Monica Frwy (I-10). On exit list does every highway need to place alternate name; like saying Century Frwy from i-405 exit list; outside I see it as i-105 West to LAX Airport; East to Norwalk. Can I go by what I see outside; or i cannot do that.--Freewayguy Msg USC 02:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Duly noted. Should meet the Manual now. Cheers - CL — 22:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, my bad. Two separate highways. Working on the cleanup now. -- Kéiryn (talk) 02:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to explain your actions here... --UsaSatsui (talk) 18:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't Harbor Frwy made in 1964 while Pasadena Frwy start between 1938 and complete in 1953? This is what this site said, and 75.xxx.xxx wants both Harbor and Pasadena Frwys merge. They both suppose to be seperate page. Harbor Frwy has too much infos to merge with Pasadena Frwy. Gaffey St. I thoguht is delete part of SR 110. The RandmcNally map 2004 I have no longer have parts of SR 110.--Freewayguy Msg USC 16:42, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, it's not important in the big scheme of things. I made the change as when I went through FAC last time I, and the others in line in front of me, were getting raked over the coals for consistency in the footnotes. Most of the article uses the cite templates, which uses a complete date. So I changed the others to match. IIRC an article was even failed because it was mixing the cite templates with the citation templates and/or Harvard citation templates (they are different and are for different writing styles). Dave (talk) 05:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NE2, I have recently installed Quantim GIS, but I am confused on how to make maps. Could you explain the software, after all you are an expert. --CG was here. 19:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you tell me if you are going to make a junctions list for U.S. Route 97 in Washington. If you are, please do it before August, and if you aren't, I'll do it. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 03:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[removed]
Please add the missing Indiana Toll Road infobox. --75.47.194.16 (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
{{Jct|state=IN|INT|}} --75.47.194.16 (talk) 09:45, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to say -- nice job on the Lund Highway article! Arcane stuff, but very interesting. (I drove that road as a kid in the 1960s, BTW, and most of it was just a narrow, single lane of asphalt. When I returned last summer, I saw that the county had milled the asphalt off of all but the first few miles, so the route is now largely a gravel road.) Cheers. Pitamakan (talk) 13:15, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Notifying you directly because you took part in the preceding discussion. Please see Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Proposal to change CSD G7. Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your recent work on disambiguating geographical names. Stepheng3 (talk) 13:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How in the world did you get access to the route log for SR-195? I tried visiting that website to no avail. CL — 20:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Others on archive.org: 89 186 (these two may be useful for an article on North Temple) 237 238 239 288 --NE2 07:03, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you just move all of those company names to the transport names, particularly when you haven't ever had anything to do with them and a simple look at the page history would show that I have done everything to them? Good plays for WP:BOLD often make bad plays for Wikipedia:Consensus; please don't be rude. • Freechild'sup? 00:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We're trying to get Trump Tower Chicago ready for another go-around in a couple of weeks. I'm an idiot on image issues, so I don't know, but one of the images that people found acceptable at FAC was just deleted; do you have any opinion on this? See the argument at User_talk:TonyTheTiger. (feel free to reply here, I always watchlist.) - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 13:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the help with image issues at WP:FAC; most editors who engage that "line of work" burn out quickly. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A revisit needed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ernest Joyce. Thanks, NE2, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:02, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I thought this article is about harbor Frwy only. I know part of SR 110 belongs to Harbor Frwy; but Gaffey St. I thoguht is delete part of SR 110. LA-Orange County maps is simply outdate. Pasadena Frwy is on its own page; on i-110 and SR 110 we have no place to write about Pasadena Frwy.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 18:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I already reported Freewayguy to WP:AIV. --75.47.138.12 (talk) 18:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I noticed on the WP:FAC page that you are a proficient image license reviewer. I am preparing to nominate Washington, D.C. for FA status in the next few weeks and would appreciate if you could review the images. If you have time to look at the article, there is an open peer review to make comments. Thank you for your help. Best, epicAdam (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise it looks good. --NE2 20:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Should I-210 and SR-210 be kept merge. Originally; I see you put the purple tag on I-210 and SR-210 page after you fix the infobox, amy I ask why you want them merge. I-210 is alot older than SR 210. i thought and I-210 use to end at kellog Interchange near West Covina. The SR-210 was sign after 2003 when Caltrans eliminate part between old SR 30 and kellog Interchange, though the SR 30 still exist between I-215 and I-10 east of San Bern.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i didn't put the purple tag on both I-210 and SR-210; I see you propse that merge. I just merge base on the tag. I just want to know why is that neccessairly.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure the image would be better off removed? I was using the Japanese box art to show the significant difference, as well as the fact Mario was not shown to be the pilot until the game's international release. Would a better caption suffice instead?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Washington State Route 531 has recently passed its GA and is up for A-Class review. According to the article history of the article, you are a contributor to this article. Please leave comments at this link. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 17:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have dealt with your outstanding concerns with the images on this article, which unfortunately has meant deleting one where I cannot establish a date of publication before 1923. But that's life. Thank you for your interest. Brianboulton (talk) 20:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Infobox road/GA/shield BL Template:Infobox road/GA/shield BS are for Interstate Business and Template:Infobox road/GA/shield SR-Bus are for Georgia State Route Business are missing and i urge you to add it now because it is showing it on Interstate 75 in Georgia and Interstate 575. --75.47.129.198 (talk) 08:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How did you get AWB to do this? I like to have it go into all of the talk pages of all the articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/New articles and add {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places}} if it's not already there. Do you know how to do that?--Appraiser (talk) 13:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
First get a recursive list from Category:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places (this may take a while). Save this list as a text file. Save the list on Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/New articles as a text file and import it (after clearing the category list). Convert to talk, and filter by finding the difference with the category list. Then use "prepend" in the "more" tab. --NE2 13:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ... Why did you tag Hercules (1907) talk page with the {{WPT}} template? It's a tugboat. Does if fall under the scope of WPT because it was once owned by Western Pacific Railroad? Just wondering. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Damm it! NE2 review this report and go tell this user KelleyCook (talk · contribs) off royal. I don't care what it takes but just get it done is it clear?! --75.47.130.250 (talk) 16:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What possed you to move Fourteenth Street Bridge? There's no need for disambigation, as it's the only one on Wikipedia, or likely to be on Wikipedia.--Bedford Pray 16:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Former SR 31 requires a map. Can you add a map if you have time for this one. --75.47.207.22 (talk) 23:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That Crosscut.com article? I wrote it :) --Lukobe (talk) 23:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Did you tag the I-210 and SR-210 articles for merge? Don't those two routes have similar informations or like in alot of ways. I know SR-210 is made in the 2000s and the I-210 is like made in the 1960s. I know both i-210 and SR-210 is Foothill Frwy.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 03:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you add these following infobox templates: Template:Infobox road/CA/abbrev I-Trk Template:Infobox road/CA/link I-Trk Template:Infobox road/CA/shield I-Trk. Interstate 5 has a truck route in Tunnel Hills next to I-210 (Foothill Freeway) and SR 14 (Antelope Valley Freeway). --75.47.149.223 (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NE2, SandyGeorgia has asked if your concerns about the image sourcing at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ian Johnson (cricketer) have been addressed. I think I have, but could you confirm? Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 02:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How would I reference the PDF you gave me for the route log of SR-181 (I'm working on it now)? CL — 05:04, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | <font=3> Thanks again for your comments - Forksville Covered Bridge made featured article today! Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:07, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] | ![]() |
---|
Please stop edit warring over this. First, Amity isn't notable: it has neither its own fire district, a school or road with the name, a developed center, or a ZIP code. Nor is it a CDP. It's real, but not everything real is notable. You need to explain its notability better than that. Second, you can't develop this beyond stub level ... believe me, I know this particular area. One of many onetime communities in New York that have simply left behind only a name someone used to fill blank space on a map. All Wikipedia needs to say about it can be said in one or two sentences at Warwick, New York. It can never be developed above stub level. It's better off as a redirect to the town article. I have defended you when you've been this difficult over at USRD ... please do not make me regret it enough to request protection. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In any event I have opened an AfD on this one because it's the only way I can think of to settle this. Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Artisol2345 (2nd) -- KelleyCook (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whence the notion they're a freight carrier? They may have hauled a little freight in the early days, but I don't think they do so anymore, and I don't know of any remaining traffic sources on line; NVF is moribund, and I can personally vouch for the fact the siding there hasn't been used in years. Choess (talk) 19:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NE2, could you please make a map (svg) of the location of the North Spokane Corridor? There is a WSDOT map right here and I would like the map to be located at Image:North Spokane Corridor.svg. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 21:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does SR 107 still exist or its eliminate?I still see it on CSC code and I still see the SR 107 post out passing it on i-405 Frwy. The Truck list site still shows Route 107, except they highlight it in gray in the column. I don't know what all these colors on Truck List is for, so I'm confuse if SR 107 is still maintain by Caltrans or not.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 01:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whats those colors like yellow, pink, and blue for? THose colors on California trucklist confuses me, and I can't even determine if route still exist or not. I thought SR 47 runs from SR 1 to like Sepulv. Blvd I thgouht. I thguoht the section between Sepulve. Blvd and SR 91 is eliminate. On CSC code they still say SR 47 runs from SR 1 to i-10. On mapquest they say exit on Alameda St (CA-47). This I'm not positive if SR 47 ends at Sepulv Blvd. or SR 91.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 03:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me what's the color on Truck List for? Its only confusing.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 03:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can link to bugzilla requests with the syntax [[bugzilla:####]] where #### is the bugzilla number. I filed a duplicate of your bug about redirect fixer and section links, thinking you did not file a bug because you didn't link to one. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
takes me to "The Cincinnati Lancet and Clinic." Did you have a couple of browser windows open and copied the wrong add? Leaving this here since it's too minor a mistake of mine to clog an already-bloated thread with.
Oh, and while I'm here I might as well make this disclaimer: If anything I write comes across personal or nasty or biased, please let me know. This is a contentious area, and I often have problems with my "tone" not being read the way I intend.
brenneman 04:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does SR 33 have any ohter names besides Ojai Freeway? I don't hear any other names of SR 33 besides Ojai Freeway, any Caltrans website don't mention other names besides ojai Frwy. i'll check the west coast highways, maybe I'll find out on that webiste. I believe I went on it last year I didn't pay attention ot those names since I was so new to those scenic routes, possibly concur of SR 41 or SR 46 the ones I know I was on.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 21:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
i took a look at West Coast Highways, and I don't find any other names to scenic routes besides Ojai Freeway.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 21:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It probably doesn't. Don't guess. --NE2 21:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I found this on google maps; Its maricuopa Highway, and West Side Highway-thats northeast of I-5 I beleive. It has alot of other alternative names. Everytime I go on scenic route, I always have to scratch my mind like 10 times, to guess what highway I was on. And sometimes I have to go on major highway like SR 99 to find out what strange route I was on.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 21:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The new article (at 'Grant Street (Pittsburgh)' rather than the original 'Grant Street' location) seemed to contain even less context than the original with no sources, and any claim to notability seems stronger in the deleted article if anything. You are welcome to go ahead and create a new page, with references and claims to notability. It still seems to just say that it is a street and only gives normal (uncited) properties inherent to any street (length, name and termini) and a (significantly shorter) list of buildings. Ian¹³/t 21:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I am interested to see where you've changed Middlesbrough & Guisborough Railway to Middlesbrough and Guisborough Railway and to understand that it is in line with, erm, some policy or other. I'm not a railway expert or anything and I honestly don't want to get into 5,643 pages of policy docs on the ampersand so I just wanted to ask you - before I make a fool of myself trying to "helpfully" edit things! - whether the change from "&" to "and" is meant to be general, encompassing all the places where the M&G is mentioned, including captions and diagrams etc as well as text? Or is there some other rule regarding this, that I should be aware of before I start blundering around in Guisborough or Nunthorpe or whatever?! Sorry if I am being thick (or even megathick) but a word of guidance would be greatly appreciated! Cheers. DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I deprodded these because WP:PROD should not be used on redirects. You need to bring these to WP:RFD. And honestly, I don't see the problem with Michigan Southern Railroad (1986). --UsaSatsui (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An article that you have been involved in editing, North Dakota Avenue (Washington, D.C.), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Dakota Avenue (Washington, D.C.). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —D. Monack talk 20:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for the late delivery; here is the June edition of the newsletter.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||
Volume 2, Issue 5 • 21 June 2008 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Hello. I recently reviewed the article U.S. Route 89 in Utah for a GA promotion. The article was nominated by User:Splat5572, but seeing as this user is under accusation of being a sock, and his talk page is protected, and you seem to be the dominant editor of this article as of late, I figured I should notify you of its status. The article is very good; it is very close to achieving GA. However, there are some things I'd like to see taken care of; I've left comments on the article's review page. The nomination is currently on hold.
Obviously, since you didn't nominate the article, you have absolutely no obligation to improve it to GA status, and I realize and respect this. However, you have been editing this article liberally (a commendable effort, by the way), and I would hate to see this fine article failed due to a lazy nominator. If you would like to improve this article, your resolve is commendable, and if not, your motives are very sensible. Either way, I would appreciate a reply so that I may determine a course of action for this nomination. Thank you, Robert Skyhawk (Talk) 01:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Now that we have List of numbered highways in Utah and List of state highways in Utah, we need to make modifications to the road infobox for Utah. Of course, I have absolutely no idea what to do, so I was wondering if you knew the procedure in order to change the infobox. Cheers - CL — 05:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh - I forgot to teach you to fish. Filter "what links here" for the list by namespace: [6] --NE2 06:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I forgot to mention there's also Template:Infobox road/UT links for a second line, but I don't think we need that. How about the way it is now? (I left a link to state highways in Utah; maybe we can have a separate descriptive page like state highways in Washington.) --NE2 06:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does Foothill Blvd. even use to be part of SR 210? You have a source? This is what you wrote on intersection tables. I was wondering why earlier you suggest SR 210 to be merge into I-210. Wasn't I-210 complete in 1971? or was I-210 once part of SR 210.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 19:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This and SR 39 on major intersection you put Foothill Blvd. as Former SR 210.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 20:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you even understand the link you post?It said nothing like SR 210 use to be Foothill Blvd. Thier numbers is strange and tough to understand. On Los Angeles-Orange County map 1963 plan whats the 9 (210)mean? And was I-210 formerly SR 210, because thats not what I've learnt.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Splatt7752 has been messing up the list by bringing the list from Eastshore Freeway to I-80 (CA). i don't know why the heck he does this. Should Eastshore Freeway be merge into i-80 because I doubt so. it seems like it have enouhg information to kept a seperate page like Golden State Freeway.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 16:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you answer questions for us. Splat5572's duplicating exit lists from Golden State, Santa Ana, San Bernar, Eastshore, Central, Hollywood, Ventura Freeways by putting the back on I-5, US-101, i-10, I-80 articles. The exit lists is display on thier own page, so they don't need to display on the provincal page.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 17:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well "Splat (talk)" was taken, so I had to put some number in my username when I registered this account. "5572" was the last four digits of my lucky ticket number, so I figured "5572" is easy to remember. (And please don't mind that periodically I retire an account, change my password so I can't get back in, and come back to Wiki under a new account. This is technically not against policy, and I have my reasons for doing this.) --Splat5572 (talk) 16:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On ARR reclassification from Class II to Class III?
The ARR article says:"In 2006, the company earned a profit of $10.4 million on revenues of $148.9 million, $132.7 million of which was operating revenue."
49CFR1201 says: "1-1 Classification of carriers. (a) For purposes of accounting and reporting, carriers are grouped into the following three classes:
For specific citation/references, see Talk:Alaska Railroad
All the Class articles, Class Templates, and List of Class ... probably need updating. I will research GC.CA (Canada) when I get a chance and post any information on the Talk:Class I railroad page to consolidate things there. LeheckaG (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can we call those shields NYS? The problem is that Image:I-00 NY.svg already existed, and NYS seems to close to another file.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 21:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why not upload over Image:I-95 (NY).svg? That's just a duplicate of Image:I-95.svg. --NE2 21:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please remove some extra samples from Santa Ana, Golden State, Ventura, Central, and Bayshore Freeways. Those lists already existed on those pages, and there is no point it to have it show up on I-5, 80 and US 101 again or to duplicate an exit list again when it's not that needed. Wikipedia is not an mapquest, so agreed?--Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Splat5572 (talk · contribs) continues to put the Santa Ana, Golden State Freeway back to exit list on I-5,and Hollywood, Ventura Freeways back to exit list on US 101, and Easthsore Freeway back to exit list on I-80. This tells me we don't no longer need exit lists on Golden State Freeway anymore. I'm not going to go through those wars again because I was blocked for 24 hours, and I just got out of it.
What's going on? It's really hard to follow this when you're only on once or twice a week... --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
UDOT's installed overhead signage on I-215 northbound prior to the Legacy Parkway exit. It appears as if they're going to sign LP with its logo (the logo on the upper left here) rather than an SR-67 shield. I have the image ready for uploading but I don't know what image tags I could put on it. Since you seem to be the copyright expert, do you have any advice as to what rules apply to this image? Thanks - CL — 01:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you make any suggestions/comments on the peer review before I suggest the article for GA? Thanks! --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 06:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. You removed the PROD from this article (and the South Junction), stating It's notable enough for a mention and redirect somewhere, Could you please supply some evidence of this notability? As far as I'm aware, these are just two ordinary junctions like any other in the country. Alternatively, if you think they can be redirected, please make some suggestions as to where. I intend to send these to AfD shortly unless these issues are resolved. See also the discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Articles on Railway Junctions. — Tivedshambo (t/c) 06:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Peer review/Washington State Route 531 if possible. Thanks! ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 17:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I created the redirects per requests by the IP, working backwards through the list, and therefore saw your comment last. As a Brit, I don't really know how referred to the roads are as "freeway" - if you want, I'll just tag them with CSD G7 if you really object to their existence. - Toon05 17:43, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At map of SR-202], I am assuming the RR on the right that curves away from the route is the Kennecott line, but is the line that crosses east to west under SR-202 the Feather River Route? --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 23:44, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why you removed the major rivers from exit list? The previous problem is background colours when the colspan used to be shaded in gum blue. Should the body waters be mentioned on exit list or not? I thought we just can't use background colors such as gum blue.--Freewayguy Call? Fish 23:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
diff "They don't actually operate in Pennsylvania." My understanding is that they do: [8] "Ohio Central Pittsburgh Lines, THE PITTSBURGH & OHIO CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, (P&OC): Commenced operation in 2000 on 43 miles of line formerly owned and operated by the Pittsburgh Industrial Railroad. The P&OC Main Line extends from Neville Island on the Ohio River near Pittsburgh to Arden, Pennsylvania with branches to Esplen and Armstrong Mills." At least one other line of theirs operates in Pennsylvania. Is this not what's meant for that category? Additionally, I'd be interested in your input on whether or not the various short lines should be merged into the main Ohio Central article. --Rkitko (talk) 01:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why would this photo be deleted if I specify non-commercial? Please point me to the WP rule that requires it to be available for commercial use. I uploaded this 4 years ago and it has never been questioned before. --Robbie Giles (talk) 00:29, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I've replied to your post on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation. Best wishes, MSGJ (talk) 08:30, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]