User talk:JD3rulo
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Hi JD3rulo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your addition to Jessie J has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Your addition to the article here: (link...) uses text directly copied and pasted from http://www.divadevotee.com/2011/04/jessie-j-vocal-profile-range-by-request.html Begoon talk 07:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi my friend, it's me JD3rulo. I am wondering why you let me a notification saying that I can't use a link to a blog page as a reliable source, so you mean its content must be wrong? I just wanted to complete some of the topics that are waiting to be writen for making Jessie's page more complete. I personally had doubts about her vocal range so I made research and I convinced myself she's a mezzo-soprano because she spans from A3 to A5 in her song Mamma Knows Best, according to the sheet music. So if you wanna keep the page the way it was before, I'm telling you it's wrong because it says she's a soprano. Also I'm not sure why you replaced the picture that I hung up to the one that was before, my picture is oldest (2011) but I could say everyone would be pleased to watch it instead of yours, because she doesnt' look good with that hairdo. Whatever the decision you make, I'm telling you one thing: if all of you are so meticulous about editing pages, you should dedicate more time in upgrading articles and don't let them abandoned as you usually do. Th@nk$ 4 ur t!m3.JD3rulo (talk) 06:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's also not a reliable source - read WP:RS for what sources are acceptable.
Finally, instead of being upset and defensive when your edits are reverted, try to read and understand the explanations as to why, either here, or in the edit summaries of the reverting editor(s). That way you can learn what is, and what is not acceptable. Edit warring your changes in after reversion is never acceptable. We edit collaboratively here, by consensus, and editors need to abide by that consensus at all times. You'll find the responses you get are heavily influenced by your own attitude. Good luck. Begoon talk 07:31, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JD3rulo, thanks for contacting me about collaborating on the Jessie J article. I'm not that familiar with her work or career, so don't know how much help I could actually provide. I'd be happy to take a look at anything you wanted to add, but you may find it more useful to work with someone who's edited the article and knows more about her. My knowledge is sadly limited to seeing her on The Voice on a couple of occasions, and hearing her songs on Radio 2. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JD3rulo. Thanks for the offer but I mostly work on articles of Australian artists. I don't know much about Jessie J but I do like her songs though. 0z (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hola! Entiendo y hablo un poco el español porque lo estudió en la escuela.I don't know anything about Jessie J, but I have added her vocal range and type. Your last edit the article was reverted by User:Fat&Happy because the singer's official website is not considered a reliable, published, third-party source. Thanks for contacting me, have a nice day too! ~ benzband (talk) 15:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hey JD3rulo! Thank you, for reaching out to me. I have not been very active on new projects for wikipedia lately, so I am primarily interested in maintaining my own articles and interests. I can tell you from looking at some of your attempted edits that it would be a good thing for you to rely on only third party sources. Newspapers, magazines, and books are usually better sources for the information you want to add. Blogs, websites that are primarily commercial in nature, and information directly from the artist are not generally acceptable as sources for information on Wikipedia. Believe me, I understand where you are coming from, because I have read many many articles on the Spanish Language Wikipedia, and have even translated a few into English. I can see a lot of difference, especially the amount of primary source information and original research that is allowed on there. But on the English Wikipedia, it just isn't allowed. Best wishes to you. JMax (Okay, tell me. What'd I do this time?) 18:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm JD3rulo. I'm interested in collaborating to translate articles from Spanish to English or contrariwise, so if you can assign me some articles I would be pleased to translate them. I'll wait for your answer in my talk page. Que tengas un buen dia!JD3rulo (talk) 23:32, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would love to help with finding reliable sources for the Jessie J article. I've been scouring the internet for sources that prove her vocal range for a long, long time, with no success. Let me know if you find anything! I might be able to word it out for you and add it to the article in a way that we can guarantee it won't be deleted! --Thevampireashlee (talk) 22:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I got your message but I'm sorry to say I don't think I'll be able to do that. I don't often edit on articles like those and I live in the Czech Republic so that would be difficult for me. Sorry. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'll make sure to keep an eye on the charts for "Bang Bang." Thanks for your request! --GouramiWatcher(?) 22:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JD3rulo! I will gladly update the charts for "Bang Bang." It seems that some other people are also helping so I'm sure everything will be added as soon as the information is available. Thank you for asking me! Divine618 (talk) 03:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What’s goin on? I sure will keep an eye on the us billboard hot 100 for you, as i already do haha. im a nicki minaj fan so im hoping it would chart high. we have had a lot of airplay, and atleast 400,000 digital downloads and atleast 5.5 million streams. looking at other no. 1 debuts examples from katy perry, there is a chance it might debut no. 1 on the hot 100 charts but this is only my estimate so let’s hope for the best! chart will be released on thursday so we will find out then!Isaacdas11 (talk) 23:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for "The Pink Print" to the "The Pinkprint". Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, "The Pinkprint", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728). Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://www.search.com.vn/wiki/en/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014. Thank you for your time, KaneZolanski (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Direction: Where We Are - The Concert Film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Strong, Rock Me and Kiss You. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on New7Wonders Cities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Create the page again, create a talk page and reference the Talk on New7Wonders. I'll watch it and contribute to any dissent. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of mezzo-sopranos in non-classical music, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]