The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Overall: New enough, long enough, neutral, and everything is sourced with no evidence of plagiarism. Sources are in German, but a spot check (including the hooks) using Google Translate shows no problems. QPQ not needed, as this is user's fourth nomination. I personally find the original hook more interesting, but both are supported by the citations. This is good to go. CanadianPaul 22:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)