From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 13:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead and infobox;
- Section 1;
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Section 3;
- by far the most comprehensive; "comprehensive" in which sense? In the size of the agreement or in exchange of technology etc.
Y Re-worded. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- training of personnel; by whom, US or OK or mutual
Y Mutual. Added. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- There are also confidential intelligence matters covered by the agreement -> Confidential intelligence matters were also covered by the agreement
Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- section 3.1; para 3; What is "HEU"? Never defined in the previous text, please define it on the first mention
Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Link "Herbert Loper" on the first mention in para 1 of section 3.3
- He already appeared in the previous section. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- J.H.B. Macklen -> J. H. B. Macklen; per MOS:INITIALS
Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Link Aldermaston
Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- para 1 of section 3.4; highly enriched uranium (HEU); has been already linked and defined before, dup-link
Y Removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- para 1 of section 3.4; tritium; already linked, dup-link
Y Removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- conversion for 21.86 tonnes
- Fissile material is always in metric. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Section 4; all good
- All images OK
- External links check shows a dead link
- {{tick} Restored from archive. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio check 1, 2, 3 shows violation possible, but they are mostly due to quotations. So no issues.
- G'work, nice article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:52, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): ![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism): ![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused): ![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): ![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
![](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/16px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]