04:3104:31, 12 July 2024diffhist−541 Zourafa rv, undue weight and not supported by source. Like with other Aegean islets, this may fall under the general "grey zone" claims of the Turkish side, but the Turkish government has never officially named this or any other specific island as disputed, except ImiacurrentTag: Manual revert
13:3813:38, 11 July 2024diffhist−809 Bitola inscription no reason to repeat all that here under "legacy": (a) it's already covered above, and (b) it's patently wrong (all these details are only in Zaimov's conjectural parts, not actually on the stone)Tag: Manual revert
11:4611:46, 10 July 2024diffhist+214 Bitola inscription →Text: reformat and restructure text reconstruction section. We need more info about the alternative reconstructions and which of the historical references are actually secure and which are conjectural.
06:1006:10, 10 July 2024diffhist−376 Bitola inscription even an incorrigible tendentious POV-pusher like Jingiby should be able to understand that opinion statements such as "make no sense" or "defies logic" can't be stated like that in Wikipedia's own voice. Seriously