Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).
This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.
Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. I intend to work on this page now. Apologies for not making edits to this draft on a more consistent basis over the past few months. Thank you. 70.22.239.17 (talk) 13:50, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)19:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much. It is being discussed in Wikisource now and I will nominate it to be re-deleted once the discussion is finished. --Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Extraordinary Writ: The case in Wikisource has been resolved and this file is not needed anymore. It is just some unsourced and imprecise transcription of a document and another document containing the original text was uploaded to Commons instead, so it can be re-deleted. I do not think it is necessary to WP:PROD it, imo it can be speedied right away. Thanks very much for help! --Jan Kameníček (talk) 09:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArborChamp:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)20:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. I would love you to take a look and let me know if you think it is ready to be submitted. I was nervous to submit it before ArborChamp (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AdarshVerma0:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T17:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. It seems that both the article that we have and the draft are very low-effort pieces. I don't know what to do about this. BD2412T18:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minolta STF 135mm f/2.8 T4.5. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)I just saw that our article on the Minolta Smooth-Trans-Focus lens was PRODed. I ask it to be restored. This lens is highly notable for being based on a unique optical design utilizing an apodization filter. It is highly regarded by photographers as a special portrait and landscape lens, and there have even been photographers who switched to the Minolta/Konica Minolta/Sony A-mount system because no such lens is available in other systems. (Actually, in recent years, there are a few more similar designs, but Minolta's pioneering design originated decades ago.) The nominator obviously has no clue about photography and didn't do the necessary homework to nominate the article for deletion. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:14, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, BD2412. I remember that there have been a large number of redirects into this article as part of the infrastructure we have created around articles about photographic lenses. This was a particular pain to create due to all the name variations and the special "["/"]" characters used in the offical name of this lens and the unique T-stop apertures used by this lens. Presumably, these redirects were deleted as well when this article was deleted. Can you please restore them as well, as they were part of the very carefully created infrastructure around this and other lens articles. After all these years, it would take a tremendeous amount of time to recreate them all manually. Thanks. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've undeleted all of the redirects. This wouldn't have happened if there had been multiple secondary sources supporting these claims. When I saw it when reviewing all articles tagged with {{correct title}} it looked like a clear WP:NOTDIR violation. * Pppery *it has begun...00:44, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Anatroccolo blu, and I would like to request the undeletion of this Creste dei calciatori deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Anatroccolo blu Anatroccolo blu (talk) 20:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Anatroccolo blu:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm 00A86B, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 00A86B (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@00A86B:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T21:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm McFartDoogles, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it, a few more sources have popped up regarding this individual now, Thank you. McFartDoogles (talk) 23:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @McFartDoogles:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Timlikesspace, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Timlikesspace (talk) 02:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Timlikesspace:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandhan Mutual Fund (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Liz (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. DMacks (talk) 06:11, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can ask at Liz's talk page. I don't think she monitors her pings regularly, but checks the talk page. As suggested at the Teahouse, you should have participated in the deletion discussions. Also note the give your three best sources next time advice. Jay 💬12:04, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Starklinson, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Starklinson (talk) 10:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Melvinx100, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Melvinx100 (talk) 12:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will be providing all references. I would rather not start from square zero again. I am not asking to have it published, I am asking for an access to the previous content so as to start editing, complementing, and previous and new sources. Adelbibi93 (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm CHUPACHIEP, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. CHUPACHIEP (talk) 15:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CHUPACHIEP:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Nishidharmacenter, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Nishidharmacenter (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Nishidharmacenter:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
@Closed Limelike Curves:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)23:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm TheRain07, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. TheRain07 (talk) 00:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @TheRain07:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Biggollden, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Biggollden (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Biggollden:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm DSP2092, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. DSP2092 (👤, 🗨️) 15:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DSP2092:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 15:54, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This draft just got deleted but I still need the access to the draft to review it (if not to develop it). For example, because I am not the author of the draft, I have no idea what it is about. —Taku (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to a quick Google search, this theorem seems to be notable enough for Wikipedia (so we need to develop the article on it). —Taku (talk) 15:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T16:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T16:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Todd Stallworth, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Todd Stallworth Dkscsoccer (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dkscsoccer:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T16:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have come back after a hiatus far longer than I would've liked (academics, exams and all). Would appreciate a WP:REFUND of the draft above. Thanks.
Also since the tool apparently doesn't want me to put two pages in the title, I'd also like to undelete Draft:Kriegsspiel in the modern day. Fermiboson (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fermiboson:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T16:45, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Christiangamer7:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 18:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tracklan2: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 18:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi HouseBlaster. The reason I left it unchanged is because I was trying to track down reliable and verifiable sources for the article. Much of the story surrounding the residence has been shared orally in the town of Aalten/via word of mouth, so this has been a bit of a task. I now have three new sources to add and I also have photographs. I intend to get this article to completion before the end of the year. Thanks Tracklan2 (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Indepenent sources would be required to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Gabriel601, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. But before then I would love to know is there any need restoring a draft article that was created by someone I cant figure out the editor or should I just go ahead in creating a new draft, hmmm. Thank you. Gabriel(talk to me )11:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gabriel601:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. UtherSRG(talk)13:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FloridaArmy:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 16:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be a notion that is introduced recently and thus probably does not pass notability (as too soon). But I still want to double-check that by looking at the draft. —Taku (talk) 16:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is likely already covered in mainspace but I still want to check that (and merge materials that need to be merged). —Taku (talk) 16:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - mostly vandal edits by an IP editor, and the maximum coherent content it had at one stage was Faces:20 Edges:54 Vertices:36. Rightly deleted as a G3 and the editor blocked for vandalism. Jay 💬16:58, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Userspace draft I'd like to give a second go with. Deleted under U1, as at the time I decided to abandon the draft. —–TCMemoire19:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Jamaldavis, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Jamaldavis (talk) 22:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamaldavis:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 23:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Abhiramakella:Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 23:06, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@FloridaArmy:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 23:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This draft appears to have been deleted as abandoned three times already (although this is the first RFU request for restoration). What is the reason for this, and how can we be certain that restoring it will result in work being done towards submission? BD2412T23:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was abandoned initially due to the page subject’s unavailability and then awaiting several references that were to be uploaded to 3rd party sites. All of these are now complete and with the subject fully available to provide content, I guarantee that we will proceed with the complete submission this time. 108.234.52.39 (talk) 01:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you clarify what you mean by "the page subject's unavailability"? Do you mean that the general himself was unavailable? BD2412T01:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the general was unable to provide information earlier due to his active affiliation with his parent organization (Federal Government of Pakistan).
I am not paid at all, the general is my father and has been asking for this page to be created. There is zero monetary incentive, just helping my old man out in his retirement. 108.234.52.39 (talk) 04:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would really appreciate if the page could be undeleted, give that this isn’t a gig. Just doing my dad a favor now that he’s fully retired and wants his work documented on WP. 108.234.52.39 (talk) 04:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although deleted 3 times and restored 0 times, the 3 versions were contiguous, and continued from where it left off. Are you connected with, or are the same user as Ztariq94 or Saadrana219 or the IP editor 119.73.115.73? Jay 💬08:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. Draft:Sam Distefano restored. But references need to be specific. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)11:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Iconic landmark of Bengaluru city in India. Similar in significance to Freedom Wall in the US, and plenty of trustworthy sources have covered it. The author's personal decision to remove it shouldn't override the importance of the subject matter —27.7.90.15 (talk) 11:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Zarana Mehta (Architectural & Interior Designer ) (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)The reason is have made and created my own article for biography , i request to keep it published itself , & undo any deleteions stuffs .My kind & warm regards .[reply]
Wikipedia doesn't accept autobiographies or promotion of oneself in userspace. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for notable subjects, not social media. Wait a few years, and if you do as well as an architect as you have as a student, then someone will be able to write an article about you and your accomplishments using what they find in published media. Acroterion(talk)14:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pncke:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. BD2412T20:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm PhD4NRG, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. PhD4NRG (talk) 18:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Thriley, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Thriley (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thriley:Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T20:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. BD2412T20:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @FormerlyARockstar:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. This is not the usual type of undeletion request as I do not dispute the original deletion, but would merely ask that the history of what is now a redirect be restored, and it can remain a redirect afterward. I first attempted this request here and while Liz said "I will be glad to help you" when time permitted and things were not as chaotic for her, nothing happened. I've given it a couple months and figure that's long enough to now request it on this page. Thanks. —23:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)2605:59C8:150D:D610:BD96:F332:55B9:1C0E (talk)[reply]
Hi, I'm Kitkat12326, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Kitkat12326 (talk) 23:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Kitkat12326:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This file was uploaded as non-free content, but the logo seems too simple to be eligible for copyright protection per c:COM:TOO United States. Its originally uploaded version was first reduced and then deleted as orphaned non-free use per WP:F5, but it would be better better if the originally uploaded version was restored (assuming of course its the same logo) before the file is moved to Commons. —Marchjuly (talk) 00:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Thisisnotcam, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ɯɐɔ💬02:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @Thisisnotcam:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm BubbleWombleBee12, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. BubbleWombleBee12 (talk) 09:50, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BubbleWombleBee12:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)09:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Abisten, and I would like to request the undeletion of this Matild Palace deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Abisten (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Abisten:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I initially only seen this article due to working on one in Uncyclopedia.co. However, it seems that ironically, he's more likely to be notable enough for Wikipedia now than he was a few years ago. Regardless, I'm requesting that all the versions of the page be userfied so I can take a crack at making an article. OhHaiMark (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @LemurianPatriot:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @Lilypetrova:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Manny20444, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Manny20444 (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @Manny20444:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm KMB47, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. KMB47 (talk) 21:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. @KMB47:Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
G13. This is a notable topic although it may be notable enough for a standalone article (in that case, a merger will work). —Taku (talk) 09:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TakuyaMurata:Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. UtherSRG(talk)11:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Acuity Knowledge Partner, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Acuity Knowledge Partner (talk) 10:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Acuity Knowledge Partner:Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acuity Knowledge Partners, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, 78.26 (talk·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. UtherSRG(talk)11:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Journowarrior, and I would like to request the undeletion of this [Draft:Simi Jolaoso] draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Journowarrior (talk) 11:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Journowarrior:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. UtherSRG(talk)11:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Kumar (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Push.althaf, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Push.althaf (talk) 13:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Push.althaf:Not done You have created the draft with significantly more information than what was at the draft. Please proceed to read WP:BACKWARDS to propel you forwards with your draft. - UtherSRG(talk)14:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailingsmooth5:Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
Was previously deleted via PROD. Noor Zahi has since qualified for another Olympics ([2]) and there appears to be some coverage of him, e.g. [3][4]. Also likely to be further coverage in Arabic. —BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]