Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.
Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:
Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.
Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus to move the page is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will carry out the request. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion may be closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.
Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.
Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself.
Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:
No article exists at the new target title;
There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.
If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you mayrequest a technical move.
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Gotjawal Forest→Gotjawal (currently a redirect back to Gotjawal Forest) (move·discuss) – "Gotjawal" is a generic Jeju language word for the wild forest, kinda like how "the bush" is used for Australia. It shouldn't be a proper noun like the current title. This is backed up by the content of the article. There are grammar mistakes here and there in the article; I suspect the titling is a similar misunderstanding. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 07:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that's what this is; I'm not worried about tautologies here. The places on the list you link are single geographical features, e.g. a lake or a river, that happen to have a tautological name.
Gotjawal is not one specific feature, it's a category: multiple different places that are disconnected. There are several different gotjawal forests that each have their own individual names.
If that is the case, the article would need to be updated (with sources) to reflect that, as it currently describes it as a single forest. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE)15:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it already does describe it as multiple forests, but it's just unclear because of grammar and the telephone game played over 10+ years of people trying to fix the grammar over time and misunderstanding it.
[1] this academic source describes it as a category, not as a single forest. [2] This source does too: Four gotjawal regions have been singled out for their well-preserved conditions -- Hankyung-Andeok Gotjawal and Aewol Gotjawal in the west, Jocheon- Hamdeok Gotjawal and Gujawa-Seongsan Gotjawal in the east.
If the page communicates an impression of it being a single forest, it's incorrect. I was going to get around to rewriting the page anyway. Do I need to do that first before the rename? 211.43.120.242 (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
'Kanjur' is the Area name and 'Marg' means Road in local language, so these two are separate words. Here are some news references 1, 2, 349.32.231.23 (talk) 05:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not uncontroversial; proof of WP:COMMONNAME needs to be given. The pictures in the article seem to suggest no space in the name; you'd need to prove that most reliable sources spell it with a space in order for this move to pass 211.43.120.242 (talk) 08:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was simply looking through the references in the article and checking which name pops up more in sources at a glance. I'm not making a statement about which title would be more appropriate, just that a full discussion may be beneficial to establish a consensus on the topic. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tsc9i8 Sources use both names so this is not necessarily uncontroversial. There is also a semi-notable "Canada Permanent Building" in Edmonton which complicates things. CFA💬18:51, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Red Slash: are you sure you wish to go ahead with this? I personally don't think your close is a good one, there are good points made by both supporters and opposers regarding common usage, and it should have been closed as no consensus. Or if you feel strongly about it then you should have cast a "support" !vote. But I suppose if you don't reconsider, pending a move review, we will go ahead and make the move as proposed. — Amakuru (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Moving to contested due to discussion here and elsewhere; an MRV is likely to be opened though. @Red Slash:, next time you should request pages that are move-protected to "Administrator needed". ToadetteEdit!18:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. A move is potentially controversial if either of the following applies:
there has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
someone could reasonably disagree with the move.
Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested. For technical move requests, such as to correct obvious typographical errors, see Requesting technical moves. The technical moves procedure can also be used for uncontroversial moves when the requested title is occupied by an existing article.
Do not create a new move request when one is already open on the same talk page. Instead, consider contributing to the open discussion if you would like to propose another alternative. Multiple closed move requests may be on the same page, but each should have a unique section heading.
Do not create a move request to rename one or more redirects. Redirects cannot be used as current titles in requested moves.
To request a single page move, click on the "New section" (or "Add topic") tab of the talk page of the article you want moved, without adding a new subject/header, inserting this code:
{{subst:requested move|New name|reason=Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}
Replace New name with the requested new name of the page (or with a simple question mark, if you want more than one possible new name to be considered). The template will automatically create the heading "Requested move 10 July 2024" and sign the post for you.
There is no need to edit the article in question. Once the above code is added to the Talk page, a bot will automatically add the following notification at the top of the affected page:
A single template may be used to request multiple related moves. On one of the talk pages of the affected pages, create a request and format it as below. A sample request for three page moves is shown here (for two page moves, omit the lines for current3 and new3). For four page moves, add lines for current4 and new4, and so on. There is no technical limit on the number of multiple move requests, but before requesting very large multi-moves, consider whether a naming convention should be changed first. Discuss that change on the talk page for the naming convention, e.g., Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (sportspeople).
To request a multiple page move, edit at the bottom of the talk page of the article you chose for your request, without adding a new header, inserting this code:
{{subst:requested move| current1 = Current title of page 1| new1 = New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion| current2 = Current title of page 2| new2 = New title for page 2| current3 = Current title of page 3| new3 = New title for page 3| reason = Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}
For example, to propose moving the articles Wikipedia and Wiki, put this template on Talk:Wikipedia with current1 set to Wikipedia and current2 set to Wiki. The discussion for all affected articles is held on the talk page of the article where the template is placed (Talk:Wikipedia). Do not sign the request with ~~~~, since the template does this automatically (so if you sign it yourself there will be two copies of your signature at the end of the request). Do not skip pairs of numbers.
RMCD bot automatically places a notice section on the talk page of all pages that are included in your request except the one hosting the discussion, to call attention to the move discussion that is in progress and to suggest that all discussion for all of the pages included in the request should take place at that one hosting location.
For multi-move discussions hosted on a page which is itself proposed to be moved, it is not necessary to include the |current1=Current title of page 1 for the page hosting the discussion, as its current title can be inferred automatically. Occasionally the discussions for significant multi-move requests may be hosted on WikiProject talk pages or other pages in Project namespace, in which case it is necessary to include |current1= to indicate the first article to be moved.
Please list every move that you wish to have made in your request. For example, if you wish to move Cricket (disambiguation) to Cricket because you do not believe the sport is the primary topic for the search term "Cricket", then you actually want to move two pages, both Cricket (disambiguation)andCricket. Thus you must list proposed titles for each page affected by your request. For example, you might propose:
If a new title is not proposed for the sport, it is more difficult to achieve consensus for a new title for that article. A move request that does not show what to do with the material at its proposed target, such as:
Use when the proposed new title is given. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:. This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
Use when the proposed new title is not known. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:. This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
This template adds subsections for survey and discussion. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst: Click the "New Section" tab on the talk page and leave the Subject/headline blank, as the template by default automatically creates the heading.
Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst: and place this tag at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion. Add additional related move requests in pairs (|current3= and |new3=, |current4= and |new4=, etc.).
All editors are welcome to contribute to the discussion regarding a requested page move. There are a number of standards that Wikipedians should practice in such discussions:
When editors recommend a course of action, they write Support or Oppose in bold text, which is done by surrounding the word with three single quotes on each side, e.g. '''Support'''.
Comments or recommendations are added on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *) and signed by adding ~~~~ to the end. Responses to another editor are threaded and indented using multiple bullets.
The article itself should be reviewed before any recommendation is made; do not base recommendations solely on the information supplied by other editors. It may also help to look at the article's edit history. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations, as well as prior move requests. They may contain relevant arguments and useful information.
The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations that are not sustained by arguments.
Explain how the proposed article title meets or contravenes policy and guidelines rather than merely stating that it does so.
Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.[a]
Do not make conflicting recommendations. If you change your mind, use strike-through to retract your previous statement by enclosing it between <s> and </s> after the bullets, and de-bold the struck words, as in "• SupportOppose".
Please remember that reasonable editors will sometimes disagree, but that arguments based in policy, guidelines, and evidence have more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers an argument that does not explain how the move request is consistent with policies and guidelines, a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion may be useful. On the other hand, a pattern of responding to requests with groundless opinion, proof by assertion, and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider using a dispute resolution process.
Relisting a discussion moves the request out of the backlog up to the current day in order to encourage further input. The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion. In general, discussions should not be relisted more than once before properly closing.[b] Users relisting a debate which has already been relisted, or relisting a debate with a substantial discussion, should write a short explanation on why they did not consider the debate sufficient to close. While there is no consensus forbidding participation in a requested move discussion after relisting it, many editors consider it an inadvisable form of supervote. If you want to relist a discussion and then participate in it, be prepared to explain why you think it was appropriate.
Relisting should be done using {{subst:RM relist}}, which automatically includes the relister's signature, and which must be placed at the very end of the initial request after the move requester's signature (and subsequent relisters' signatures).
When a relisted discussion reaches a resolution, it may be closed at any time according to the closing instructions; there is no required length of time to wait before closing a relisted discussion.
If discussion has become stale, or it seems that discussion would benefit from more input of editors versed in the subject area, consider more widely publicizing the discussion, such as by notifying WikiProjects of the discussion using the template {{RM notification}}. Banners placed at the top of the talk page hosting the move request can often be used to identify WikiProjects suitable for notification.
(Discuss) – Roman Palestine (period) → Roman Palestine – This page was originally created over the redirect that currently sits at the base name, but this move was contested, so I have recreated the page with a disambiguated title. Roman Palestine is a period term for the portion of the history of Palestine characterized by Roman rule, from the time of the vassalage of the region after the Romans intervened in local politics until the Arab conquest. There are some slight variations to this, with the Britannica entry setting the start date as the fall of Jerusalem in 70 AD, but as other sources show [3][4], 63 BC to 70 AD can also be characterized as "Early Roman Palestine". From the literature both on page and out there and discoverable, and not least the Britannica entry, it seems pretty clear that the period is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term. While the current redirect to Syria Palaestina strikes upon perhaps the most obvious constituent subdivision of the Roman period, there was nothing less Roman about the earlier Roman Judaea or the period of local dynastic vassalage still prior to this, or the Byzantine-era Diocese of the East period afterwards. On the contrary, it would be highly unusual not to consider the earlier periods also part of the Roman Palestine period (and to laser focus in on Syria Palaestina). Works such as Jesus and the Politics of Roman Palestine simply make no sense if you exclude Roman Judaea from the equation. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Meyerhofer → Meyerhofer (surname) – the article title should clarify Meyerhofer is a article about a surname called Meyerhofer because it sounds like it is about something like a place so the article name should be changed to Meyerhofer (surname) to clarify it is a surname similar to Johnston (surname) instead of just Meyerhofer. 173.72.3.91 (talk) 17:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC) Fixing format of move request. Rotideypoc41352 (talk·contribs) 17:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Oho Ou → Ou Hao – His name in Chinese characters is 欧豪 (Ōu Háo in pinyin). It's written in Latin script on posters, disc cases and distributors' pages for films he's acted in as Ou Hao. Some examples: * [5] * [6] * [7] (in the billing block on the back) * [8] (in the billing block on the back) * [9] (in the billing block on the back). It's written in Latin script on the covers of music releases and on Apple Musicetc. as OHO, which is written as one word but sounds like both syllables of his full Chinese name. The current article title, "Oho Ou", is a weird, unofficial mash-up of the above two spellings that makes no sense because it contains the Ōu sound of his family name twice (as Oh- and then Ou), both before and after the Háo sound of his personal name (as -ho). Converting it back into Chinese characters would get you "欧豪欧" (Ōu Háo Ōu), which is clearly wrong. As he's now known more for acting than music, I propose making Ou Hao the article title and mentioning in the opening that he's also known mononymously as OHO. Tempjrds (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Bensci54 (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Covanta → Reworld – – Covanta was renamed to Reworld back in April. Since then, most people have been using the new name. This is not a controversial move, but I'm using this tool to request a move on account of my COI - I work for the article-subject. I'd also like to suggest a redirect from Covanta to the new Reworld title, replacing "Covanta" with "Reworld" throughout, and adding a "(previously known as Covanta)" at the beginning. NKR2009 (talk) 16:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – David Johnston → David Johnston (governor general) – Very common name (20+ entries at the disambiguation page) and I don't think the GG is the primary topic. On pageviews, David A. Johnston is a clear number one, averaging more than double the views of the governor-general; given both are not "in the news" I think this trend is likely to persist. In addition, two others David Johnston (the British politician and the Australian admiral) have surpassed the governor-general on certain days within the past few months. In terms of historical significance, I don't see a strong argument for the GG's primacy either – while the office he held is significant, I'm not sure it's more significant than any of those held by the other David Johnstons, as evidenced by the lack of standalone biographies / academic works as per the source list in his article. ITBF (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Stray cow → Stray cattle in India – Contrary to the earlier discussion on this talk page, specifying "in India" seems like the correct level of WP:PRECISION in this case, to unambiguously define the topical scope of the article. As currently written this article is about the situation in India rather than the wider concept of stray cattle in general, and it seems enough of a standalone topic to remain so. Belbury (talk) 12:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Jacob Mwiimbu → Jack Mwiimbu – This minister is commonly known as Jack Mwiimbu here in Zambia and the first thing someone will search for is Jack and not Jacob. Therefore request is made that this is moved to the main space for Jack Mwiimbu. Submitted for review. Revention24 (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Intellivision Amico → Amico (video game platform) – Due to recent developments and announcements, the Intellivision brand is no longer officially attached to the project, the company has announced its name change to Amico Entertainment and now it is not limited to a console but a series of products such as (currently) a mobile app with in-app purchases, a mandatory companion app and the upcoming/proposed controller and console, this name should be the most appropriate now. MexTDT (talk) 23:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – National Rally–The Republicans alliance crisis → 2024 The Republicans (France) crisis – The crisis mostly concerns The Republicans, and has little to do with the National Rally party. They were just there and said "OK" to Ciotti's faction joining their movement. I understand the current name but it's both too long and gives too much spotlight to the RN. The French article is called "2024 crisis in The Republicans party", which is a more accurate description of the situation. I suggest 2024 The Republicans (France) crisis, in line with the name of the article The Republicans (France). Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Tswana language → Setswana – WP:COMMONNAME. Searching setswana gives you results mainly saying setswana. Most of them that say Tswana are about Tswana people and reading the sources later state that the language they speak is called Setswana. 48JCL 20:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 20:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – National Democratic Party of Germany → Die Heimat (political party) – When a party changes its name, it seems more than natural to rename the page too. Current English-language sources on the party refer to it by its new original name, Die Heimat, which should therefore be the title of the page. It doesn't seem sensible to me to keep a name that has been abandoned for a year now. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Alcaeus → Alcaeus (disambiguation) – The Greek lyric poet Alcaeus is the clear primary topic in both likely usage (WP:PT1) and longterm significance (WP:PT2). Likely Usage: There is really no debate that the lyric poet considerably dwarfs the others in page views. He is competing with comparatively niche cultural and mythological personalities; it is telling that all of the other Nine Lyric Poets are named monogamously on Wikipedia (although Simonides of Ceos is not, the name Simonides redirects there regardless). “Alcaeus of Mytilene” is simply not the common name for the lyric poet. Longterm significance: Alcaeus the lyric poet has been canonized in ancient literature, with an oeuvre described as “highly esteemed in the ancient world” ([10]), and an entire lyrical meter named after him (the Alcaic stanza). He is the subject of repeated monographs and studies; the other Alcaeus personages receive no where near this much attention. The previous move request spurred into a tangential analysis of how Alcaeus is presented in classical scholarship. The sources consulted were Brill's New Pauly and the 200 year-old Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology; both do not list the the lyric poet first. Since this is blatant cherrypicking, I’ll have a go myself: the 2014 Oxford Classical Dictionary, more comprehensive and up-to-date than both, lists the lyric poet first. In any case, Wikipedia is not a classical encyclopedia, it is a general encyclopedia. Other general encyclopedias simply call him "Alcaeus" (see Britannica and Oxford Reference) – Aza24 (talk) 18:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Rallying → Rally (motorsport) – "Rallying" remains vague, as it can apply in literally every other type of sport "rally" is a term as well as the stock market. It is not an adequate disambiguation. Britannica calls it "rally" [11] so that's what I went with here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:51, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Kriss (surname) → Kriss – Delete disambiguation page and move to main title. The only other entry at the dabpage is KRISS, which is DIFFCAPS and can be adequately addressed in the "See also" section, no separate article required. 162 etc. (talk) 02:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Jutish → Jutlandic – I'm requesting a move to the new article, along with its associated talk page, because while the terms "Jutish" and "Jutlandic" can be synonyms and refer to either anything related to the ancient Germanic tribe called the 'Jutes', anything related to the Jutland peninsula in Denmark, or the 'Jutlandic dialect' spoken in Denmark, the terms "Jute", "Jutish" and "Jutic" normally refer to anything related to the ancient Germanic tribe called the 'Jutes' (according to the entries on Wiktionary, Jute, Jutish and Jutic), while the terms "Jutlandic" and "Jutlandish" normally refer to anything related to the Jutland peninsula in Denmark, or the 'Jutlandic dialect' spoken in Denmark (according to the entries on Wiktionary, Jutlandic and Jutlandish), while the term "Jutlander" normally refers to anyone from the Jutland peninsula in Denmark (according to the entry on Wiktionary). But this definitely warrants further discussion. It seems we have five options here: # Retain the status quo, with the disambiguation page as the primary topic, # Move Jutlandic dialect to Jutlandic and retarget Jutish to Jutes, # Retarget Jutlandic to Jutish, # Move Jutish to Jutlandic and then do either of the following: :: a. retarget Jutish to Jutlandic, :: b. retarget Jutish to Jutes My personal preference is (4b), to move Jutish to Jutlandic and then retarget Jutish to Jutes, so I've styled the RM that way. But editors are also free to suggest whichever option they want in this RM. PK2 (talk) 03:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 12:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Bulbourethral gland → Cowper's gland – This gland is the male homologue of the Bartholin's gland. Because the latter has an attributive name as its title rather than a purely anatomical one ("greater vestibular gland"), I believe the former should as well. Zoozoor (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Sthanakvasi → Sthānakavāsī – This article was living over 10 years under this proposed more appropriate and consistent name, per this change. However, earlier this year this change was reverted in this change. The rationale is unclear, as I was unable to find any documentation on this change. Requesting a discussion and a potential renaming per International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration used in other articles on Jainism. I have changed the label of the Wikidata item accordingly. Solarius (talk) 18:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Queen of Heartstalk 00:43, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Norman Hunter → Norman Hunter (disambiguation) – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the footballer is the primary topic with respect to usage, because it is much more likely than all the other topics combined to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term. With respect to long-term significance, either no one is the primary topic or else the footballer is the primary topic, and it makes no difference because the footballer is the primary topic as to long-term significance. None of the other topics come close in terms of fame or significance. PearlyGigs (talk) 16:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As nominator, I would like to withdraw this request as there appears to be little chance of a consensus. Please close the case. Thanks. PearlyGigs (talk) 20:00, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Tales of the Jedi (TV series) → Star Wars: Tales – Since this move made nearly three months ago has been objected to, here is an RM. I personally don't agree with the need as consensus was reached on the matter. Never the less, this anthology series had its first installment released as (formally) Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi (commonly Tales of the Jedi) in October 2022, with it announced in April 2023 that it would get a second season (wording used by media outlets, though the quote from Filoni was "Tales of the Jedi was so fun the first time, I decided to do some more.") Subsequently, it was announced a year later in April 2024 that this second "season" was a new "installment", Star Wars: Tales of the Empire (commonly Tales of the Empire). This press release shows the use of both formal names as well as the key quote in my view (and the determination of the previous consensus) that Tales of the Empire was the second installment of the "Tales" series. Thus, an appropriate name to address this anthology series considering the formal name would be Star Wars: Tales, which provides a WP:NATURAL name. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Shikike → Fujiwara Shiki-ke – The last name was Fujiwara, with the added epiteth "Shiki-ke". "Shikike" alone was not the family name nor is it transliterated correctly (-ke means "House"). Request move to clear confusion. See also Owari Tokugawa family discussion for similar issue and solution. Gryffindor (talk) 15:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Mayerhofer → Mayerhofer (surname) – the article title should clarify Mayerhofer is a article about a surname called Mayerhofer and not something else like a place so the article name should be changed to Mayerhofer (surname) similar to Johnston (surname) instead of just Mayerhofer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.72.3.91 (talk) 15:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Finnic languages → Baltic-Finnic languages – The common name for these languages is 'Baltic-Finnic languages'. Additionally, the article about the peoples who speak these languages is titled Baltic Finnic peoples. However, I have reservations about moving the Finnic languages (disambiguation) page to the title 'Finnic languages' due to ongoing debates regarding the validity of the Finno-Permic languages as a taxonomical group. It might be more appropriate to consider deleting the disambiguation page altogether. Furthermore, all interwikis are using Baltic-Finnic in their titles. Vandervalp (talk) 14:40, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel – I believe that enough time has passed since the last RM (which proposed the simpler "7 October attacks" name and closed with consensus to retain the current title) to re-propose a title change for this article. I believe that "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel" is the WP:COMMONNAME for this event, as seen in sources such as: * Al Jazeera: "... counter the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which saw ..." * Bloomberg: "... trapped in Gaza since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which prompted ..." * CBC: "... around the world since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel of Oct. 7 but are now ..." * CNN: "... from the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel being held ..." * Euracitiv: "... triggered by the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel in which ..." * France24: "Before the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that triggered ..." * ISW: "... spokesperson claimed that the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel was retaliation ..." * Middle East Eye: "Following the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel and subsequent ..." * NPR: "... Palestinian armed groups since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that set off the war ..." * NYTimes: "... including some who participated in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, and that ..." * Reuters: "... were involved in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that precipitated ..." * Times of Israel: "... during and after the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel." * The Conversation: "... participated in the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which resulted ... " * WaPo: "Since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, restrictions have ..." Many sources simply say "7 October" or "October 7 attacks" instead of spelling out the full name, but I believe that while "7 October attacks" could be a more COMMON name, I think that it fails WP:AT#Precision in favor of "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel." DecafPotato (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Module:Language → Module:Wikt-lang – This module has a very misleading name. It is solely used to create Wiktionary links with a language anchor, and should not be confused with Module:Lang which is used for most other language related usages. This move will match the template name at Template:Wikt-lang. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Magik → Magik (disambiguation) – As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Comics, the appropriate naming convention for a comics character most known by their codename (as is the case for Magik) is to have an article at said codename (examples cited include Batman and Spider-man). The only other character to carry that codename is Amanda Sefton, and that article no longer references Magik in the title (per the conclusion of the last RM). The articles at the current Magik article (which serves as a disambiguation page) are this article, a limited series about this version of the character, the aforementioned Amanda Sefton, two related music projects by Tiësto that are barely stubs, a brief article about a polish rapper, and a programming language which is not widely used. Based on this, I think it would be reasonable for this article to take up the page at Magik and the disambiguation to go back to Magik (disambiguation) (where it previously was) Darquis (talk) 10:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Favonian (talk) 11:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Doctor Who season 1 → Doctor Who season 1 (1963–1964) – I think there is a consensus for another requested move and for these move to be part of it, so I am starting another formal requested move. Cal3000000 (talk) 07:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 09:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Vespina (aircraft) → Airbus Voyager ZZ336 – I am a close watcher of aviation generally and military aviation specifically, and I had no idea what this article title referred to. WP:AT states that when article titles have multiple possibilities, "editors choose among them by considering several principles: the ideal article title precisely identifies the subject; it is short, natural, distinguishable and recognizable; and resembles titles for similar articles." None of those are true to "Vespina (aircraft). Being strictly factual and naming it as <Aircraft (i.e. general type name)> <Registration (denoting specific aircraft> is much clearer. The current name is vague in the extreme. Mark83 (talk) 08:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Airborne Interception radar → Aircraft interception radar – The article's current title, "Airborne interception radar," is problematic for two reasons. First, the claim that "AI," an abbreviation used throughout the article, stands for "airborne interception" (in terms of radar) is unsourced, and is contradicted by a number of credible sources that state that "AI" has historically stood for "aircraft interception" (see sources below). The second problem with the original title is that it's misleading and/or confusing. There's an entirely different class of "airborne" radars NOT covered in this article: air-to-surface-vessel (ASV) radar systems, which are designed to detect ships and surfaced submarines, and which are often installed on aircraft. (ASV radars are already covered, appropriately, in a separate article.) As this change may have significant impact, I'm submitting it as a request rather than making the change directly. Thanks. Supporting sources to retitle article to "Aircraft interception radar": * From the first entry in the article's Bibliography (AP1093D: An Introduction Survey of Radar, Part II(PDF). Air Ministry. 1946.) : [opening statement, on page 6:] "Aircraft interception equipment, commonly known as AI [...]". * Henry E. Guerlac, 1987. "Radar in World War II". ISBN 0-88318-486-9. (https://archive.org/details/radarinworldwari0008guer/mode/2up?view=theater) : [from p. 1123, in the glossary:] "AI: Aircraft interception. Radar to detect and trace aircraft from another airplane." * From "A Textbook of Radar". Edited by E.G. Bowen. United Kingdom, Chapman & Hall, 1948. (https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_Textbook_of_Radar/K4I8AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA530-IA4&printsec=frontcoverv) : [section title, p. 530:] "Aircraft Interception (AI)" * Norman Fine, (2019). "Blind Bombing: how microwave radar brought the Allies to D-Day". Potomac Books. ISBN 9781640122208. : [page xv:] ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMS : AI aircraft interception : [p. 70:] Influenced greatly by British needs, the initial radar projects — an airborne radar system for aircraft interception (AI) and a gun-laying radar that would track bombers overhead and automatically control the aiming of antiaircraft artillery pointed skyward — were strictly defensive at this time. : [...] : Britain also critically needed an aircraft-to-surface-vessel (ASV) radar system that could locate German U-boats from the air and destroy them before they could dive. * U.S. Radar: Operational Characteristics of Radar Classified by Tactical Application: AI—Aircraft Interception Sets. Joint Chiefs of Staff. 1 August 1943. [...]. (https://web.archive.org/web/20100410000309/http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/radar-8.htm) : DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -- NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER : 805 KIDDER BREESE SE -- WASHINGTON NAVY YARD : WASHINGTON DC 20374-5060 : [Chapter heading, pp. 57-60:] AI--Aircraft Interception Sets .. Marnofaldi (talk) 17:45, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!03:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Auriga → Auriga (disambiguation) – The constellation is the primary topic. It has much more pageviews[1] than any other topic that has its own article, with only Charioteer of Delphi having a considerable number of pageviews, altought 3.3 times less than the constellation (749,272 vs 223,709 pageviews since 2015). It is also notable that the Auriga of Delphi redirect neither exists nor is linked at its "parent" page, which shows that almost no one has ever searched for Charioteer of Delphi using the name Auriga of Delphi. Therefore, Auriga (constellation) satistifes the first criterion of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term.21 Andromedae (talk) 18:15, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!03:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – PBA Best Player of the Conference Award → PBA Best Player of the Conference award – The proper names of these awards do not include the word award, as checking news sources verifies. About half of these were originally correct and were capped in 2021 without discussion, for consistency with nba. Consistency with our own MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS is a better way to go. Alternatively, we could just drop the word award from the titles. Dicklyon (talk) 01:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Chris Patrick → Chris Patrick (American football) – Disambiguate with Chris Patrick (ice hockey). The hockey Patrick, as the new general manager of a National Hockey League team, is about as important/primary if not a little more than a long-retired NFL player with three career games, hence the disambiguator; however, it's too early to tell if the hockey Patrick will become a true primary topic, hence why I'm not requesting that to be moved to the overall name. TheKip(contribs)00:32, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
July 8, 2024
(Discuss) – Cincinnati Center City Development Corporation → 3CDC – The corporation is better known by its acronym than by the full title, to the extent that many may not recognize its full title (recognizability is one of the main WP:CRITERIA for picking article titles). News articles will commonly use "3CDC" first, and only use the full name on second mention (e.g. WCPO, WVXU), or they might never mention the full name at all (e.g. Fox 19, WCPO, Cincinnati Magazine). I think part of the reason it's hard to recognize is that it's an atypical style of acronym (i.e. one would expect the short name to be "CCCDC"). Other articles where we use an acronym instead of a full title include NATO, UNESCO, CNN, NBC. IagoQnsi (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 8 July 2024 Ukraine missile strikes → Kyiv children's hospital airstrike – The children's hospital strike is clearly the most notable and covered of these strikes, and most media outlets are covering that strike exclusively. We can mention the other strikes in the body without obstructing the searchability of the article by using a title very unlikely to be searched by someone who simply saw an article online. Most news articles have the hospital attack as the main headline and have the many other strikes as a sidenote. [24][25][26][27]Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 23:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war → United Kingdom and the Israel–Hamas war – Not only match two other articles, Qatar and the United States about their role in this war, but a word like "support" isn't neutral even if the UK policy is to support Israel in this conflict. The article does make mention of opposition to the government support for Israel, therefore this isn't solely about support for Israel. The title should be reflected in a more precise manner than an outright position of support or opposition in the title. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Names for books of Jewish and Christian scripture → Names for Jewish and Christian holy books – This is a worthwhile article, but IMHO its current title is misleading. I expected "Names for books of Jewish and Christian scripture" to list the Jewish and Christian names for books of the Bible. Instead, it lists divisions within the Bible, and the more authoritative of the other Jewish types of holy books. I believe that in both religions "scripture" is only used for the Bible. "Sifrei Kodesh" is a wider category used in Judaism, literally meaning "holy books", although this does have a wider scope than the current content of the nominated article. – FayenaticLondon 14:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Bensci54 (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Adil Shahi dynasty → Sultanate of Bijapur – These articles are about the states themselves, the Sultanates, not the dynasties. We should also standardize whether the Deccan Sultanates are titled by their dynastic or geographical name, and the geographical name makes more sense here both for what these articles are actually about for what a reader would actually search. The other two Deccan Sultanates are already titled for their geographic-based names (Ahmadnagar Sultanate and Bidar Sultanate). The first and third pages to be moved have the "Sultanate" first as that is what seems to be more common per ngram [28][29]Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – YuYu Hakusho (TV series) → YuYu Hakusho (2023 TV series) – Or YuYu Hakusho (live-action TV series). Current title less clear, despite short descriptions by Wikidata or a template. As I'm pretty sure, it may also refer to the well-known 1990s anime series. The current title should be redirected to YuYu Hakusho#Media, and the Netflix series should be disambugated further to differentiate from the anime one. George Ho (talk) 11:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – ÖBB → Austrian Federal Railways – English language sources refer to the organisation as Austrian Federal Railways. In Austrian sources the full name of the organisation is "Österreichischen Bundesbahnen" which when translated to English is Austrian Federal Railways. Therefore the page should be moved per WP:COMMONNAME. No prejudice to an alternative move to Austrian Federal Railways (ÖBB). TarnishedPathtalk08:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2024 Pune car crash → 2024 Pune Porsche car crash – The word "Porsche" is a big identifier of this case - the brand of the car crashed is a big assosciation and that is how the case is often talked about in the media. People know it as the "Pune Porsche" case rather than the "2024 Pune car crash". Hence, for this article and this case, I believe the word Porsche should be added. The article thumbnail contains all references, more can be researched. To help my case, the article's thumbnail image is already the Porsche car model. Pharaoh496 (talk) 20:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)— Relisting.>>> Extorc.talk 07:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.– robertsky (talk) 05:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Jeong Do-jeon → Chŏng To-jŏn – Per WP:NCKO, McCune–Reischauer romanization should be used for pre-1945 Korean names. According to Google NGram Viewer, use of Jeong Do-jeon spiked around 2006, but cumulatively, Chong Tojon and Chong To-jon have been in much greater use. English academic articles on Korean history still predominantly use McCune-Reischauer romanization, and Chŏng Tojŏn and Chŏng To-jŏn enjoy greater currency. Per WP:NCKO, I suggest the hyphenated given name, Chŏng To-jŏn. This move request is in keeping with the move request for Jeong Mong-ju. Motjustescribe (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Blackdown Hills National Landscape → Blackdown Hills – The article was renamed from "Blackdown Hills" to "Blackdown Hills National Landscape" earlier this year by Mark999 (talk·contribs), along with several others, at least one of which has since been reverted (North Wessex Downs). Unfortunately it seems I can't just revert this change, because the redirect has since been modified, so I'm going to have to do a requested move. There are a couple of problems with this move: # This article has always been about a range of hills that is a National Landscape (or AONB as was). The move has turned this into an article about a National Landscape that contains some hills. Except that in reality the majority of the article is still about a range of hills, the Blackdown Hills, that have existed long before they were designated as a National Landscape. The crucial difference can be seen in the fact that the standfirst sentence of this article no longer makes any sense. At the start of this year it read: "The Blackdown Hills are a range of hills along the Somerset-Devon border in south-western England, which were designated an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) in 1991." Now it reads "The Blackdown Hills National Landscape is a National Landscape along the Somerset-Devon border in south-western England, which were designated in 1991 as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)." This is especially a problem for this article, which reached "Good article" status having explicitly addressed the issue of it needing to be very clear about the difference. # WP:CONCISE: there are no other Blackdown Hills articles, there is no need to disambiguate this one or make it more complex than it needs to be. The argument for naming it "Blackdown Hills National Landscape" appears to be that this is an 'official' name, but (a) that argument only holds if this article is purely about the National Landscape conservation designation area, and not more broadly about a range of hills which still are simply called the "Blackdown Hills", and (b) that wouldn't trump the CONCISE guideline. We don't name of the Lake District article "Lake District National Park". Joe D(t)17:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Ecologist Party of Romania → Romanian Ecologist Party – This is the literal translation of Partidul Ecologist Român. "Ecologist Party of Romania" would be Partidul Ecologist din România. Google results have gotten inflated due to this Wikipedia article but if we remove Wikipedia from the results the current title gets 592 results while the proposed one gets 413. "Ecologist Party of Romania" gets unreliable results like Fandom [31] or this online dictionary [32] while "Romanian Ecologist Party" gets results like the Chamber of Deputies of Romania. Google Scholar results are expected to be less affected by Wikipedia. As a result "Romanian Ecologist Party" gets 57 results while "Ecologist Party of Romania" gets 14. The proposed title is a more accurate Romanian translation and the WP:COMMONNAME in academia, and probably would be overall if it wasn't for this article. SuperΨDro14:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Bonnaroo Music Festival → Bonnaroo – "Bonnaroo" is the most commonly used, associated, and referenced name, both by the festival itself and external publications. The current page name does not include "and Arts Festival", so it is otherwise incorrect. The shortened name is appropriate under Wikipedia's naming conventions, does not create disambiguation confusion with other "bonnaroo's" (as none exist), and will appropriately conform to other major American festival pages like Lollapalooza, Coachella, South by Southwest, Burning Man, and Electric Forest (all that only have their festival name without any qualifiers, even though these "shortened" names are not their "official names"). I recognize this would take some work on the admin side to correct double redirects and other links, but believe the name change would be appropriate nonetheless. Shotgunheist💬 03:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Shotgunheist💬16:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2024 Turkish riots → 2024 anti-migrant riots in Turkey – More precise title. I had difficulty finding this article and when I saw its title I wasn't even sure if it didn't refer to another event earlier this year. SuperΨDro15:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – List of life peerages (2010–present) → List of life peerages (2010–2024) – I think that now would be the logical moment to close this list and create a new one, because this list consists of life peerages created under successive Conservative majority, minority or coalition governments during 14 years and now Labour takes the power. Closing this list now would also be in line with the two most recent preceding lists as List of life peerages (1997–2010) consists of life peerages created under successive Labour governments during 13 years and List of life peerages (1979–1997) consists of life peerages created under successive Conservative governments during 18 years. Editor FIN (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Shakti pitha → Shakta pithas – Not really a very strong support from my end, but regardless, I thought this might merit a discussion among the WP community for the record. While contemporary usage among the vast Hindi-speaking population in India seems to prefer "Shakti pithas", references to the subject in traditional Hindu religious literature is unanimously as "Shakta pithas", so no wonder that every major scholar on Shaktism or Tantra has used that term. The only book on this topic even to this day is by the noted historian Dineshchandra Sircar. Other academic sources: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Also important to note here that the present scholarly consensus is that this very concept took shape in Bengal, so the fact that even historian Sachidananda Sarkar refers to the topic as "Shakta pithas" in his Bengali book মহাতীর্থ একান্নপীঠের সন্ধানে might be relevant to consider. Thanks. JovianEclipse13:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Ismail Qemali → Ismail Kemal – I was researching on this topic and actually discovered that this figure's real name was Ismail Kemal, not Qemal or Qemali as several authors have inaccurately spelled it. The page was also moved to Ismail Kemal by CanadianFolks, though without any discussion so I thought I could request one. As they highlight, Ismail used the spelling "Kemal" in his signature (can be seen here) and also in his English memoirs, The Memoirs of Ismail Kemal Bey. The Albanian source Amfora says "King Zog I changed the Turkish name Ismail Kemal Bey Vlora to the Albanian version, Ismail Qemali or Ismail Qemal Bey Vlora, during the 25th anniversary of Albanian independence. This change occurred during Communist Albania, and his name is mentioned in the Albanian Encyclopedic Dictionary as Ismail Qemali". This confirms that his name's actual spelling was Kemal, not Qemali which was promoted by Zog I as part of his Albanian nationalist campaigns. As much as I would wish Ismail's surname to be Qemali, we have to face the facts so I would request it to be changed to Kemal. As a matter of fact, the sources on this article itself use "Kemal" rather than "Qemali" such as: *Skendi, The Albanian National Awakening (1967) *Kondis, Greece and Albania, 1908–1914 (1976) *Treadway, The Falcon and Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908–1914 (1983) *Hanioğlu, Preparation for a Revolution: The Young Turks, 1902-1908 (2001) *Blumi, Ottoman Refugees, 1878-1939: Migration in a Post-Imperial World (2013) These sources count for more than half of the article and I have only listed the sources on this article, I could go on listing several others though I think this is sufficient enough for now. Hoping for a quick move. DashnorKemalit(talk)09:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Jeong Mong-ju → Chŏng Mong-ju – Per WP:NCKO, McCune–Reischauer romanization should be used for pre-1945 Korean names. I would also argue it to be the more common name as well. Via Google NGrams [35], both Chong Mong-ju and its non-hyphenated form Chong Mongju, are more popular compared to Jeong Mong-ju. The sources I found (as well as in the article) also mostly preferred the McCune–Reischauer variant over Revised Romanization variant ⁂CountHacker (talk) 19:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – De La Salle Green Spikers volleyball → De La Salle Green Archers volleyball – The above existing pages have titles that do emulate the placement of a disambiguating sports descriptor after the team name, per WP:QUALIFIER. This style of adding descriptors has been prescribed by example by, among other similar college-sports WikiProjects, this page under WP:CBBALL and this page under WP:CFB for titles of pages about United States college teams. Clearly, these descriptors were prescribed in order to naturally disambiguate (by WP:NATURAL) a page about a team playing a certain sport from pages about namesake teams that are playing in other sports. In each of the team pages above being requested for moving, however, 1) the team name used is not that of its institution's team's uniform or collective name but the special nickname or unique moniker given to that specific team playing in its sport, so much so that the need for disambiguation disappears. 2) what is produced by the addition of a disambiguating sport descriptor after the team's special nickname is a redundancy. For example, there are no other De La Salle Green Spikers other than the De La Salle Green Archers team playing men's volleyball. For having a redundant title, the page's title then creates WP:OVERPRECISION and breaches the WP:CONCISE rule. That, however, can be salvaged by replacing the special moniker with the institution's team's uniform or collective name, a replacement which is what would have the need for disambiguation and erase the redundancy. Bagoto (talk) 09:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Bono state → Bonoman – Native name is Bonoman, Bono state is the english translation, they fluctuate between commonality per ngrams [36] Alexanderkowal (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Alexanderkowal (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Foam (culinary) → ? – Desperately needed standardization across Category:Culinary terminology, no reason to have four or five ways of disambiguating the exact same parent topic, mostly seems like a result of people creating different articles all at different times without any of the coordination usually needed to come up with the right disambiguators. I didn't want to add the newname parameters to the temp due to the scale of the proposal, however to start the conversation I'll say "culinary" would be the obvious worst option as its an adjective rather than an actual topic-noun; "Cuisine" feels the best to me as its both the most encyclopedic and can cover a few edge cases where a topic relates to food without "using heat to make food more palatable, digestible, nutritious, or safe", though I'd also find "cooking" largely unobjectionable per COMMONNAME. Browning (partial cooking), Curing (food preservation), and Proofing (baking technique) can all theoretically stay as their disambiguators are that much more specific, but I would argue they aren't actually necessary, they are only disambiguating from non-culinary topics and not from other techniques in the same category. I also wasn't sure what to do with Toast (food) as it can refer to both the technique and the resulting food item, a printworthy redirect from toasting (cuisine) may be the best option instead. Orchastrattor (talk) 16:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 18:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova → International Criminal Court arrest warrant for Vladimir Putin – It made sense to include these two together when they were the only people in Russia wanted by ICC for their crimes in Ukraine. However later new warrants appeared for Sergey Kobylash and Viktor Sokolov, and then for Sergei Shoigu and Valery Gerasimov. This article does not cover all Russians wanted for war crimes anymore and I see no more reason to group Putin and Lvova-Belova together. It is clear Putin's warrant is the primary topic. For a reason is "Putin" mentioned 73 times in the article while "Lvova-Belova" is mentioned 10. SuperΨDro 13:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Climatic Research Unit email controversy → Climatic Research Unit email leak – 'leak' is more WP:NPOV about what actually happened: the mail leaked. The controversy part is what some hacker wanted to create by leaking them, but in the end there wasn't really any controversial content and the scientists were just doing their job fine. PhotographyEdits (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Lunar soil → Lunar regolith – "Lunar regolith" is a much more accurate common term to refer to this specific Lunar surface material, and is generally a more favoured search term than "lunar soil" per google trends. The current title also unintentionally obscures this from pages like regolith, which discuss the concept more broadly that's being applied here. As others pointed out in the last move that was made, it's the more accurate term to use for this topic. I'm also requesting the same move for Martian soil. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 08:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Hwangap → Sixtieth birthday in East Asia – Welcome suggestions; I'm not sure what best title for this is. The concept is relevant to the Sinosphere (afaik particularly China, Japan, and Korea; does it exist in Vietnam?), so I just proposed a generic English-language title. See Talk:East Asian coal briquettes#Requested move 8 September 2023 for a similar discussion along this vein. I don't know much about the ceremony's varieties across Asia. Not sure how WP:COMMONNAME factors into this. Here's an ngram; the Chinese term is complicated by the fact that it overlaps with other terms, for example sexagenary cycle. If we can't conclusively determine common name, think the Eng title I'm proposing steps on the fewest nationalist toes (see the talk post above this move req). 211.43.120.242 (talk) 10:34, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Martian soil → Martian regolith – "Martian regolith" is a more accurate term for this particular portion of the Martian surface and is essentially exclusively the one used in the scientific community and literature. The current title also creates some ambiguity with the regolith article not neatly pointing to the same concept by name. I've requested the same sort of move at Lunar soil. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 08:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – WBD → WBD (disambiguation) – I'm sure that there's a Wikipedia article that should be a primary topic for the acronym WBD. According to Google search, the first 10 searched websites are referring WBD to the one of major entertainment companies. The acronym "WBD" was unknown for most people until Warner Bros. Discovery was founded two years ago. Giving the situation, we should make "WBD" as a primary redirect for Warner Bros. Discovery and adding "(disambiguation)" suffix for this article when it was moved. We could adding "WBD redirects here" hatnote at Warner Bros. Discovery article. 2404:8000:1037:456:C5F:5678:22FF:9537 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Shoop → Shoop (disambiguation) – 30+ years on, the long-term notability of this hit song is clearly established. Also this is the only article listed at the disambiguation page that sees any kind of traffic.[37]162 etc. (talk) 18:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 14:55, 27 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 16:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – John I of Sweden → Johan Sverkersson – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Both share the same name, but the king is the primary topic. # The Google Books search for "Johan Sverkersson" returns much more results than for "John I" Sweden 1222, and the results also include good-quality books from Brill and Cambridge University Press. # The article about the son of Sverker the Elder was originally created as Johan Sverkersson the elder and moved to current title without discussion. Per WP:UE the name should not be anglicized since the anglicized name is not used in the literature. In fact, there is not much English literature about him at all; I only found two mentions: Philip Line refers to him as Johan Sverkersson and Lars O. Lagerqvist as Johan (jarl Jon). The title could also be Johan (son of Sverker the Elder), Johan Sverkersson (12th century) or Johan Sverkersson the Elder, although the last one is not attested in English literature. — Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Rex parade → Rex (krewe) – The article is about the Rex Organization, not just the parade. The Rex Organization is the formal name of the krewe, but it's commonly referred to simply as Rex (or incorrectly as the Krewe of Rex). Rex Krewe and Krewe of Rex exist as redirects to this page, but Rex (krewe) would better match pages with titles that require disambiguation and would better reflect the content of the page. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Battle of Geneina → Geneina massacre – Referring to the page as the Battle of Geneina made sense when it was first created, but the June massacres and new details and reports revealing the amount of the destruction and killings shows that this was moreso a coordinated campaign of massacres and attacks by the RSF and allied militias against the Masalit people in Geneina, with just about every source highlighting the genocidal massacres and atrocities over the clashes. Jebiguess (talk) 03:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 06:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Very Nice → Very Nice (disambiguation) – Maybe an eager move, but there is only one article within the current mainspace. There are no mentions to "Very Nice" in Borat's article, the only Dermansky novel with an article is a stub, and only one album under the record label has an article, plus the label would likely be "Very Nice Records" if it had an article. Not to say these other things wont eventually be notable, but in the meantime I would say the song is WP:PRIMARYTOPICOrangesclub (talk) 06:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 06:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Template:TSGN and SE Stations → Template:Railway stations served by Govia Thameslink Railway – While a move is required to remove the unnecessary caps in "Stations", the move will also make the naming convention of this template consistent with other TOC station templates, as indicated by the consensus reached at the RM at Template talk:Railway stations served by c2c. The suggested title stems from the fact that Thameslink, Southern, and Great Northern are all a part of Govia Thameslink. At the same time, I'd like to request the Southeastern content be split into a new template called Template:Railway stations served by Southeastern for the same reasons. Jalen Folf(Bark[s]) 23:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Bensci54 (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Gaza Strip famine → Starvation of Palestinians during the Israel-Hamas war – No source is saying this is a famine. They say near-famine, starvation, or famine-like conditions. Contrary to some claims, there is not one source in this article that declares a famine. The FRC said there wasn't enough evidence to declare a famine, and other sources agreed. But pretty much all reliable sources say there is starvation. In every report, most of the population is in some form of starvation, and sources have gladly accepted this term. Additionally, starvation has been confirmed by pretty much all humanitarian orgs, the UN, ICC, and ICJ. Also, there is no common name. I want to see evidence there's a widely used name. The name doesn't have to be this, but it should revolve around starvation in Gaza. Personisinsterest (talk) 01:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Sexual and gender-based violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → Sexual violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel – Gender-based violence is defined as "any type of harm that is perpetrated against a person or group of people because of their factual or perceived sex, gender, sexual orientation and/or gender identity".[3] It is not currently clear that this article deals with any such violence other than that of a sexual nature, and even then, the lede states that male Israelis were also subjected to sexual violence (which if true suggests that it was not gender-based). A previous discussion on this topic has also shown that many people do not understand what the term "gender-based violence" actually means, so whether including it in the title is usefully descriptive is quite questionable.
(Discuss) – Nuseirat refugee camp massacre → Killing of civilians during Nuseirat raid and rescue – The word "massacre" is listed as a non-neutral term at WP:POVNAMING and should not be used unless it's a WP:COMMONNAME, which it isn't in this case. "Killing of civilians" is perfectly neutral (see WP:KILLINGS) and covers the idea of "massacre" but in a neutral way. Two anticipated objections: *While there is currently a discussion to merge this article, I don't see any consensus there. If consensus does develop to merge/delete this article, then an admin is perfectly capable of closing this RM and redirecting this article. But until then, this article must still follow WP:NPOV. *While Israeli and Palestinian officials dispute how many civilians were killed, the fact that at least some civilians (including children) were killed during the raid is a established fact that RS state in their own voice: **"At the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in the nearby town of Deir al-Balah, the dead and wounded arrived in waves — men, women and children." Associate Press **"Many Palestinians, including children, were killed and injured in the area where the operation took place, with images and footage showing a large numbers of casualties." BBC News **"Video in the aftermath of the raid showed charred bodies scattered across streets in Nuseirat, while Palestinians could be seen gathering the remains of those killed. Bloodied children could also be seen arriving at a local hospital". NBC News Finally, the move target should be "Killing of civilians during X", where X is the name decided for 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation article per WP:CONSISTENT. Currently there seems to be a lot of support for moving that article to "Nuseirat raid and rescue". VR(Please ping on reply)04:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Srebrenica massacre → Srebrenica genocide – I suggest that we rename this article to "Srebrenica genocide" now that the UN has issued its resolution on the matter today, designating July 11 as the International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica Please also check the discussion above. Njamu (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation → Nuseirat raid and rescue – Most sources are dual referencing this as a raid, attack or assault rather than just as a rescue. Guardian "Israeli attacks in central Gaza killed scores of Palestinians, many of them civilians, on Saturday amid a special forces operation to free four hostages held there, with the death toll sparking international outrage." NYT "Israeli soldiers and special operations police rescued four hostages from Gaza on Saturday amid a heavy air and ground assault",CNN "Israel’s operation to rescue four hostages took weeks of preparation and involved hundreds of personnel, its military said. But the mission began with a trail of destruction in central Gaza and ended in carnage, according to local authorities." Selfstudier (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(Discuss) – Tel al-Sultan massacre → Rafah tent camp attack – News sources have called it "attack", "massacre", "strike" and "airstrike". It is not yet clear which is the most WP:COMMONNAME. "Massacre" carries value judgement, and "airstrike" obscures the fact that many of the casualties weren't killed directly by the airstrike, but were burned alive in the resulting fire. "Strike" is very similar to "attack", but "attack" is consistent with other similar events like World Central Kitchen aid convoy attack. I also think "Rafah tent camp" is more recognizable than "Tel al-Sultan" and most sources seem to use "Rafah tent camp" or "Rafah displacement camp".VR(Please ping on reply)18:14, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]