Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 26

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Consensus to delete seems unlikely to achieve. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winx Club main characters cast.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheFallenPower (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Redundant to File:Winx-Club-poster-Nickelodeon.jpg for showing characters. Fails WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 02:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Not redundant. The other image shows the 3D redesigns of the characters that were introduced in Season 5 (which is why the caption says "in their 3D designs" and the page says "In 2012, new episodes of the series incorporated CGI-animated sequences that rendered the characters in 3D."). The original image shows the original 2D designs of the characters as shown in the previous seasons. It's one image for the 2D designs and one image for the 3D redesigns. TheFallenPower (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Uploader trying to explain what they're doing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Relist comment @TheFallenPower: Can you add a reliably sourced mention of the artstyle being changed across the show's lifespan? The image could then be used to help illustrate this change. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I added a source that says "The fairies have evolved from Straffi’s original hand-drawn characters, to 3D CGI iterations". TheFallenPower (talk) 18:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think an image of the final drawn characters makes sense to include. Failing to include them would do a disservice to the article; one such image is sufficient. What if we had an article about Mickey Mouse without a single picture of him? Now, the sketches done by one of the artists...I think it has SOME merit, but I'd be much more likely to delete that over this. Buffs (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Irigoyen Rockout.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Zixrec (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom + orphaned + other free images exist/could be made. Buffs (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hurt Business.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vjmlhds (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low quality and unused montage. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete we're not an image hosting service. This image, while free/PD, is not encyclopedic. Buffs (talk) 17:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:14, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Am Me (mixtape).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 2019AlwaysLit (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused album cover, source website does not indicate a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless an album-specific article is created post haste...I would expect a much lower res image for such an article. It certainly isn't labeled correctly regarding copyright. Buffs (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, mislabelled non-free file that has no use in the mainspace. Salavat (talk) 06:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:KBC 12 First look.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by DueMue (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I cannot find a statement at the source (Amitabh Bachchan's Twitter feed) to indicate that this image is available under a CC-compatible license. Kinu ^t/_c 21:30, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless a compatible/clear license is found. I see no way this could pass our NFCC otherwise. Buffs (talk) 17:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.