Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 27

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, no prejudice to restoration if someone is willing to create a valid fair use claim for the image -FASTILY 23:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two bottles of Fantastik cleaning spray, different scents.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Charlie Smith FDTB (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Derivative work of copyrighted designs. Could probably qualify for fair use, though. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anggun - Life on Mars.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Greenandalas (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No longer being used in the article. Doesn't qualify NFUR. – zmbro _(talk) 16:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can tag such files with {{di-orphaned fair use}} in these cases. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:51, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation, no prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth. -FASTILY 23:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soyuz MS-19 Crew Qualification Exams.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chinakpradhan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is a non-free Soyuz MS-19 mission crew photo used a list article. The image is not needed to understand this is one of many manned ISS flights. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:- This is required as requires a crew imagery as is seen with other images. Besides I have followed all the rules and regulations needed that using this image does not harm the Roscosmos and their website Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Textbook WP:NFCC#8 violation, no prejudice to restoration if the article is significantly expanded to explicitly discuss this image in-depth. -FASTILY 23:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soyuz MS-19 Official Crew Potrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chinakpradhan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image of the crew of Soyuz MS-19 is not needed to understand the mission article. As well, the crew are living people. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFC#1. Whpq (talk) 18:45, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:- This is required as requires a crew imagery as is seen with other missions of similar kind. Besides I have followed all the rules and regulations needed that using this image does not harm the Roscosmos and their website Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:59, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support In an edit I reverted myself, I had previously voted oppose, on the grounds that the crew are a "disbanded group" in the sense of the exception to WP:NFCC#8 stated in that rule. I had not realized that this is a future mission, and that a free alternative (published by NASA) will most likely become available as the mission progresses. In light of this, there is no need for either this file or the one discussed directly above. Renerpho (talk) 03:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:- This is a purely Roscosmos mission not involving nasa as there is no nasa astronaut here. So no images will be provided by NASA. Forget free images. So two images are as Wikipedia prohibits usage of a fair use media to be used on more than one one page without much need. so both these non free images are needed in wikipedia. Chinakpradhan (talk) 03:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - CRS-20 (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:14-16-Regent-Street-by-Nash-1824-drawn-by-Pugin.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tim riley (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Shouldn't the copyright have expired globally by now? Ixfd64 (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes. I adjusted the copyright tag based on that. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:3rdBaronWenlock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ravichandar84 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Assuming the date is accurate, the copyright should have expired globally by now. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Why did you bring this file here? I suspect that lots of people just tag files with {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} without bothering about the copyright status outside the United States. Just retag as {{PD-US-1923-abroad}} (if you know when it enters or entered the public domain in the source country) or {{PD-US-1923-abroad|commons}} (if you know that it's in the public domain in the source country but don't want to specify a year). --Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:J1953-1019 triple system.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nrco0e (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I initially tagged this as missing evidence of permission, but Renerpho (talk · contribs) questioned whether this is copyrightable. I guess that there are two questions. First, are astronomical photos like this above the threshold of originality? I don't know how much creative freedom a photographer has to take photos like this. Secondly, is the photographer a human, or are these photographs taken automatically by a machine? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefan2: Thanks for bringing this up here. To clarify: Whether the photographer is a human (it's not, in this case) isn't relevant, and neither is whether astronomical photos are above the threshold of originality (they generally are, even if taken by a robotic instrument). The issue is that the original image is published by NASA (part of the US government), and NASA's publications are in the public domain. The only thing that makes this copyrightable, in my opinion, is the overlayed text (consisting only of the letters A, B, C, and a scale bar). My question was whether this text meets the threshold of originality. Renerpho (talk) 22:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC) EDIT: Original discussion and argument can be found here. Renerpho (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:FAM203B locus 8q23.3.tiff (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Marin129 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Northwest Territories Licence Plate 1979 bear design.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by M4CD0N4LD-D4N (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The licence plate appears to be too recent for {{PD-Canada-Crown}}. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Lonsdale-Bryans.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RohypnolFTW (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is no evidence that the copyright holder has released this into the public domain. The part about expiry of the British copyright is irrelevant as the British copyright was restored by Council Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993 harmonising the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Venus Williams serving 2017 Wimbledon.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Narciso003 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:11, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joyce DiDonato (cropped).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Niggle1892 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:12, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:MapprPRSLnew.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Reytempo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smgsdd1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beyondcapricorn (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope (2004).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Andromeda321 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source and authorship information was added by Sfan00 IMG (talk · contribs) in Special:Diff/468615254, but it doesn't say where he got the information from. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: It looks like Sfan00 IMG (talk · contribs) simply added the {{information}} template. Both the photo description and metadata suggest the photo was taken in June 2004 — this suggests Andromeda321 (talk · contribs) is indeed the author. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader didn't specify where the image came from. The date could have been mentioned on a website where the uploader found the image or he could have seen it in the metadata. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:30, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:TMEM249 chromosomal location.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BeakersandBarbells (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.