Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maa Kanaka Durga Jhatiada(Morada).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Puresh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I doubt that the uploader had the rights to this image, given that another one of his images (File:Barsha Priyadarshini.jpeg) was found to have been taken from another source. I also need to note that I just blocked the editor because he was also vandalizing Wikipedia, giving us another reason to doubt that he actually owns the rights to said image. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teemo lantern.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Prisencolin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source of the photograph is listed as Wikimedia Commons and the license claims to be a CC license, but Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Teemo.JPG implies this is not accurate.

The photograph and the lanterns were presumably not created by the Wikimedia Commons itself, so the license is likely inaccurate. The image is currently orphaned. Sunmist3 (talk) 07:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file was an original upload onto the Commons. Does the same licensing still apply to the image even if the image was delete from Commons? It seems like the file link to a page was erroneously delinkied by the User:CommonsDelinker bot.--Prisencolin (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Cryptic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 FC Bad Kötzting.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wiggy! (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Querying if this is above TOO, I don't think it is. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:VCJosephProsser.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gavin hunter (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Technically unsourced, but clearly an old photo, FFD because the information in the linked article suggested this image might not have been first published in the US. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 November 29#File:Hahn-Cock.jpg}}

File:Hahn-Cock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Prioryman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Nthep (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amphitrite mosaic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Technically unsourced, but this is clearly a photo of roman (and thus old artwork.). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline since it's a mosaic, which has some minor 3D components. Asked the uploader about how the photo was created. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:42, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's part of a mosaic on display at the Archaeological Museum in Naples, which I photographed years ago. I've added the relevant info to the file. It might as well be moved across to Commons as there's no particular reason for it to be hosted on enwiki. Prioryman (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet. What license do you want to release the photo under? {{PD-self}}? Also asking about the three other files below this discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've added {{PD-self}}. Prioryman (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as PD-art, seeing as it's a 2D object that's being photographed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman vesuvius.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Technically unsourced, but clearly a photo of 'old' art. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as PD-art, per commons:Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_stained_glass_window_or_tapestry_found_on_the_Internet_or_in_a_book Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fates tapestry.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Technically unsourced, but clearly a photo of old art. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Closing on technical grounds; simple case of di-no source, tagging it as such. -FASTILY 01:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ancient epirus map.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ChrisO~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Technically unsourced, claimed as PD-old, hence the FFD referall vs CSD owing to image being pre May 2006. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Prioryman: How did you get to this map? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:46, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. It's not clear whether this passes the threshold of originality or not. It's right on the borderline, in my opinion, and others appear to think the same. Applying the precautionary principle, let's default to keeping this under non-free use for now. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:USM Oran (logo).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Faycal.09 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Querying on Threshold of Originality grounds, given the Commons equivalent was under a 'free-license' Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file is an official logo of USM Oran, it was disigned by me. We can see the logo in this link (Official website of MC Oran). --Fayçal.09 (talk) 16:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thanks for the response, Can you make a check on the version at Commons ?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:07, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

U're welcome. I think there is no version in commons, it's only used localy. However why not, I think we can add it in Commons. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 23:18, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This one's pushing the borders of TOO a little. Not sure that the Commons file is indeed free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:47, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:38, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:UOIT Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Querying on threshold of originality grounds, given that the Commons Equivalent file is under a 'simple' tag. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ivan Karačić.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Isidora2004 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed as self but attributed to - ZIPR Consultancy Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taida.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Taidawang (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This appears to be an unused profile of a Wikipedian, albiet a photo which would now be considerably dated. FFD owing to the date when it was uploaded. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flagstaffstation.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

One user on the file (who doesn't exist), another in the history. Who actually made this file, and how is that confirmable? Image is not in use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin, looking at deleted revisions of user pages, I can confirm that User:Ambivalenthysteria changed their username on 29-July-04, again on 8-May-06, and finally on 16-Feb-12 to become User:Vanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj.  ★  Bigr Tex 04:04, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swanstonst.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Upload by a seemingly untraceable author, the history seems to indicate it was originally PD for some reason, but there doesn't seem to be an easy to confirm what the uploader intended. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:52, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At 11:01 on 1 January 2011, User:Vanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (a user in good standing who invoked their right to vanish) both claimed ownership of the image and confirmed that they intended to release it as PD by tagging it {{PD-release}}. That's clear enough for me.  ★  Bigr Tex 04:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Majora (talk) 00:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eversholt mosaic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Emrys2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The user makes a claim that as this mosaic is part of a building (or is a work of artistic crafstmanship) it's covered by the UK FoP rules, notwithdtanding that it would otherwise be a 2D work. I'm not so sure this logic is correct, and hence this FFD. If it not under FoP, Im not seeing a reason for 'non-free' use as the mosaic is notdiscussed in the linked article. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While a mosaic is inherently 'three dimensional', this image only replicates the '2D aspects' of the work. You can't tell that there is any texture to the mosaic, and the texture contributes nothing (such as shadows) to the image at hand. It's also unlikely that the artist intended for the 'three dimensionality' to contribute anything... it's just an attribute of the medium used that it's never completely flat. I would call this a 'two dimensional work of artistic craftmanship', which is presumably on permanent public display given it's described location, and so falls under Freedom of Panorama per UK rules. Revent^talk 22:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not at all clear what either of the above participants is arguing. The Village Hall Committee is apparently in favour of the image remaining here. The committee does not employ an intellectual property lawyer on retainer, and so that is all it can say on the matter. Emrys2 (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have you asked them for Permission formally ? ( see [[WP:COPYREQ])? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source and EXIF data indicates that the uploader is the photographer. Per Revent, this falls under the UK's FoP rules. So there is nothing wrong with this image. Closing as keep. --Majora (talk) 00:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ivona2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lukeosowski (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image does not appear to be explicitly related to IVONA. Serves no purpose that couldn't be replaced with a free image. Proud User (talk) 22:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nikola Prce.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Isidora2004 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader claims own work, but placed ZIPR Consultancy in the description. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tamia at the Grammy Awards in 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Simple2010 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Small image, no exif, uploader has history of claiming ownership of others' files Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.