Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 November 19

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Israel-gaza-rockets.png.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mor2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Inadequate fair use rationale FutureTrillionaire (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the file summary.--Mor2 (talk) 01:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. "I haven't been able to find a free version" isn't what's required for fair use to be acceptable, "It's literally impossible to create a free version" is what's required. This clearly fails our fair use standards. Kevin Gorman (talk) 07:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file still hasn't been deleted yet. But it's been removed from any article, so I guess the bot will take care of it.-- FutureTrillionaire (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Come Wander With Me.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Nom ignored discussion of image and image topic in article prose. "Decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. That said, the specific scene should be discussed more fully and critically, or pick a more representative scene which is discussed critically by reviewers. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SusanHarrison.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Response How is a picture of a woman looking up enhancing the understanding of the plot? This is non-free media that must be justified on educational grounds. None of these Twilight Zone pictures do and so they all must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:55, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Pick a better, more representative scene, and make sure it is discussed by reviewers. That said, "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further exaggerates policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Unconvincing arguments to keep the image. ZeWrestler states that "is being used to enhance the description of the plot", but there is no evidence of that. Do we need an image of the characters to understand that they exist in the series? Not at all. Unlike cover art and logos where there is usually one image that identifies the topic, promotional images, screenshots, and the like require critical commentary as noted at WP:NFCI. WP:NFCC#8 requires not only that the image significantly increase the understanding of the article, but that its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. The reader does not lose any essential information without this image, and its inclusion is not merited. This same rationale applies to subsequent nominations on this page. — ξ^xplicit 01:59, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A World of Difference.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:54, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Either get some critical discussion of the depicted scene in there, or pick a better, more representative scene, and make sure it is discussed in reliable sources. That said, "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further exaggerates policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Quality of Mercy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Either get some discussion of that scene in there, or pick a better, more representative scene, and make sure it is discussed by reviewers. That said, "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further exaggerates policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joan Hackett.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Destry (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't argue "keep" for this one, because the moment of the photo is simply not distinctive. I think a better image will have to be selected and discussed critically by reliable sources. That said, "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deaths-Head Revisited.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:36, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dick York (A Penny for Your Thoughts screenshot).JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Noirish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tz 142.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ZeWrestler (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:49, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escape Clause.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Execution (The Twilight Zone).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Stop at Willoughby.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dust (The Twilight Zone).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Kind of Stopwatch.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:From Agnes—With Love (screenshot).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caesar And Me.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Leather Jackets.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Back There.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Four O'Clock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dead Mans Shoes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Nice Place to Visit.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Short Drink From A Certain Fountain.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A World Of His Own.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elergy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Hundred Years Over the Rim.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Passage for Trumpet.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Thing About Machines.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:And When the Sky Was Opened.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Shot an Arrow Into the Air.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Night Call.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:It's A Good Life.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:He's Alive.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Am The Night.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Girl Lost.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kick the Can.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Nine.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mirror Image.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Long Live Walter Jameson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ninety Years Without Slumbering.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nervous Man in a Four Dollar Room.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Livingdollscreenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Travisl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hold pending outcome of discussion at [1] travisl (talk) 07:49, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tina.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Travisl (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hold pending outcome of discussion at [2] travisl (talk) 07:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• It's worth noting, I think, that unlike most (all?) of the other items up for deletion, this is a sound file and not an image. I captured, extracted, and edited it in order to increase the understanding of the topic. Specifically, many people think the doll's name is "Talking Tina", but the sound clip confirms that it's "Talky Tina". travisl (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr Garrity and the Graves.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nothing in the Dark.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:In Praise of Pip.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr. Beavis.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:No Time Like the Past.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nightmare as a Child.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Dream of Genie.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steel (The Twilight Zone).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Bard (The Twilight Zone).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Arrival.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Big Tall Wish.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The After Hours.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Still Valley.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Brain Center at Whipple's.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Chaser.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spur of the moment.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Changing of the Guard.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sounds And Silences.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stopover in a Quiet Town.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Judgement Night.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I disagree with you Justin. This image is being used to enhance the description of the plot. Might I suggest that since this appears to be for all the TZ articles that an admin groups them all together. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:04, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zonenicktime.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ryan Anderson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miniature (TheTwilightZone).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Sing the Body Electric.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jess-Belle.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr. Denton on Doomsday.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Mute.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Long Distance Call.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Passage on the Lady Ann.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perchance to Dream.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:On Thursday, We Leave for Home.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Of Late I Think of Cliffordville.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TZPeopleAreAlikeAllOver.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jason Palpatine (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This person has posted multiple image file here for deletion. They use the same argument in every case -- the same sentence word for word. The concept they propound is a little extreme in my opinion. What they call "decorative" is their individual opinion and they seek to impose it on everyone else. The image was uploaded for informational purposes in regards to the article it is a part of. It's presence does not harm the article and does contribute to it. -- Jason Palpatine (talk) 14:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC) This User fails to understand Wikipedia's Systematized Logistical Projection of its Balanced Policy Contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)[reply]

Response Jason, this is non-free media that must be justified as having an educational purpose in understanding the topic. How is it critically important to have this screenshot in this article? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:56, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:One for the Angels.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Printer's Devil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:51, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Person or Persons Unknown.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ring A Ding Girl.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Father McKenzie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Bewitchin' Pool.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Static (The Twilight Zone).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shinerunner (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Invalid FUR: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. This image is not critical for understanding, but is used in a decorative fashion. Since this file does not greatly enhance understanding, nor will its omission greatly decrease understanding, it must be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: "decorative" is still not a valid deletion reason, and must be removed. Nominator further falsifies policy: "not critical for understanding", "greatly enhance" and "greatly decrease" are not stated in policy. Misleading about policy while attempting to enforce it is egregiously bad form. --Lexein (talk) 08:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]