Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 June 12

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jason Raphael Switchblade Jr. at The ((Robinsons Place Tacloban City)), ((Philippines)) in April 14, 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jason Collin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Duplicate and at Commons -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GVK-bio-logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stausifr (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file is not being used in the article. tausif(talk) 08:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steve Jobs next to Apple logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lucasdj1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I find it highly dubious that the uploader took the photo of Steve Jobs. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Leyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ethylene propylene rubber.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cliff12345 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The file is not needed now that I have uploaded a new one in png form. Cliff12345 (talk) 11:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Please use SVG instead of JPG or PNG. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have added a new SVG file now. Cliff12345 (talk) 11:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Unencyclopedic Orphan files uploaded by me but unusable in appropriate articles. I realise i may not have (probably not) listed these properly but the instructiongs aren't clear enough for me and i am unsure how to add the appropriate tag to the file page. Thanks for your understanding Jenova20 14:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could have requested speedy deletion as G7 ({{db-blank}}) ViperSnake151  Talk  04:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you very much ViperSnake. Feel free to ignore this request now or delist it. Thanks again Jenova20 11:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smithsonian Institute, Robert paper machine, SI 397a.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chienlit (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Allowance of Fair Use is not a Fair Use Rationale. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand - what is wrong? why isn't it? I wonder if the Smithsonian realises that giving permission for fair use is not sufficient for Wiki to use it. I think that it is being used fairly. Chienlit (talk) 16:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC requires that all non-free media have a detailed rationale discussing why the image can be used on each article it is used in. That is not a valid rationale, as it does not explain why its use would significantly increase the readers' understanding of the topic (NFCC #8) ViperSnake151  Talk  16:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is it on display? Why doesn't someone just take a picture of it and add it to the pedia. Personally I think this is a pretty low quality picture anyway so maybe its better just to get a new one rather than fight about whether is free use. Kumioko (talk)

• Delete Source is {{bsr}} (so it's not really any real source). Item might be still be on display somewhere and if so the photo fails WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blake Shelton - Over single.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Canadaolympic989 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 10:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lindy-and-Azaria-on-Rock.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unnecessary non-free image of a living woman. Note that we even already have a free video of the person in question and 'no, the reader does not need to see what the two months old toddler looked like at the time of her death. damiens.rf 16:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Disagree with nomination. Azaria is not living, and i am afraid that it is not up to us to decide what reader should not see. There is not need to delete this image, as that case is internationally known, and it is good for reader to see two months old toddler. --WhiteWriter^speaks 22:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• keep The wikipedia article is on the death of Azaria Chamberlain, not her mother. So this image serves a purpose of showing an image of the deceased toddler where no other free images are available. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that the subject of the article (Azaria Chamberlain) doesn't seem to appear in the OGV file used in the article. Thus, no free photo can be obtained from the video. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I believe photographs are a vital part of an encyclopedia. If we have a photograph of Al Capone, or Margaret Thatcher, or Steve Jobs, why not a photo of any subject of study? cheers Billyshiverstick (talk) 23:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Perhaps someone could contact Lindy herself and ask if she objects? Otherwise I agree with Billyshiverstick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.9.151.254 (talk • contribs)
• Keep: Historical photo that's irreplaceable. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Historical photo that's irreplaceable. Marshall Stax (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walsh scene wideweb 430x326.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Decorative use of a non-free image. While the event depicted on this image is notable, this image is not, and it's not necessary or helpful for the understanding of the event. It's just an aerial shot showing the abandoned cars of the policemen killed in the event. It's no surprise the image is used just as an infobox decoration. damiens.rf 18:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folbigg Laura.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The reader does not need to see a (non-free) picture of a 18 month kid just to understand it was one of the many victims of a child-killer. damiens.rf 18:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folbigg Sarah.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The reader does not need to see a (non-free) picture of a 10 months old kid just to understand it was one of the many victims of a child-killer. damiens.rf 18:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folbigg Patrick.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The reader does not need to see a (non-free) picture of a 8 months old kid just to understand it was one of the many victims of a child-killer. damiens.rf 18:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Folbigg Caleb.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The reader does not need to see a (non-free) picture of a 10 days old kid just to understand it was one of the many victims of a child-killer. damiens.rf 18:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ColdAlternateCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Easy4me (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. The article already has a different cover image: File:WayTooCold.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Kanye cleared it up in a Twitter post, as I previously mentioned, "Easy4me"'s contributions indicate a tendency to revert other people's edits to comply with his standards. An administrator deleted the file, but I reuploaded the iTunes one in good faith. Source: https://twitter.com/kanyewest/status/213686642689581058/photo/1 Ellomate (talk) 00:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • What exactly does the Twitter post have to do with this deletion discussion? The article still has an excessive amount of non-free cover illustrations for this product. The only thing which has happened is that the other file has got a different file name: File:WAyTooCold.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • The odd capitalization was not my doing. There was an upload war that took place prior to an admin deleting the image previously on Commons. I do agree, however, that the image resolution may be a bit too high. That said, how exactly is (2) covers excessive? Ellomate (talk) 06:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.