Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 May 25

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:JD and Dave.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EdRooney (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, uploader now blocked Skier Dude (talk) 03:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tnhjcikguazi.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, no source Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PENDEKAR(jpg).JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, no source Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PesilatFEM.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, no source Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kursus jurulatih.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, subjects/context not provided Skier Dude (talk) 03:39, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:TrainingnewPCS.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, LQ, subjects/context not clear Skier Dude (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:OldPCS.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Iijam (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, LQ, context/subjects not clear Skier Dude (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crust.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Petitepassionz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, LQ Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medallion-Hall of Fame The Real Ghostbusters 800.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Walter Day (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, no target article Skier Dude (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medallion-Hall of Fame Black Tiger 800.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Walter Day (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, UE, no target article Skier Dude (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thialbarbital.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Meodipt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Low quality/resolution, orphaned/replaced by File:Thialbarbital.svg. Leyo 08:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - image is non-free and does not pass NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 11:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katharine Hepburn's 4 Oscars.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by X4n6 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unfree image as this photograph contains the OSCAR which is copyrighted. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katharine Hepburn's Four Oscars.jpg Bidgee (talk) 09:08, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Image is a non-copyrighted work of the U.S. Government, which places the image in the public domain. Further, Oscars' own copyright terms permit digital use of the OSCAR as long as the "AMPAS" symbol also appears. Since it does, any copyright concerns are rendered moot. X4n6 (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Further, the image was removed from Commons, because Commons does not recognize U.S. government public domain or fair use, while Wikipedia recognizes both. It should also be noted that User:Bidgee filed the original Commons complaint, then abandoned it. X4n6 (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I suggest you read the closer's comment. Just because I take a photo of a copyrighted work and release it under "public domain" doesn't mean it can be since copyrighted objects, buildings, subjects ect have more protection (of the copyright holder's) rights then the rights of the reproducer (the photographer). This image should be Fair-use but its not. Bidgee (talk) 09:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I suggest you read the discussion with the closer. Your concerns have all been thoroughly discussed. The file is appropriate on Wikipedia, while it was not on Commons, for the reasons I've already noted. The image is non-copyrightable public domain in the U.S, while the image's subject is copyrighted, and the terms of that copyright have been expressly met here. X4n6 (talk) 09:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Bit confused where does it say that this image is in the public domain, the source page says Photos for News Media Use Only the terms of use at http://si.edu/termsofuse/ say it cant be used for commercial purposes. So it really needs a fair use declaration to stay. In the end it is just being used for decoration you dont need a non-free image of four statues to support the text. MilborneOne (talk) 09:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• If you look again, you'll notice that it actually says Photo courtesy of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery. The Smithsonian is a US Government agency, whose work is non-copyrightable and automatically in the public domain, unless there is a copyright notice to the contrary per Title 17, Chapter 1, § 105. The "Photos for News Media Use Only" you referenced, appears to refer to the additional links under "Related Content" at the bottom of the page. Also the terms of use at http://si.edu/termsofuse/ does say: "the Smithsonian allows personal, educational, and other non-commercial uses of the Content", which is what we are. But beyond that, you are correct that the same page also notes: "The Smithsonian welcomes you to make fair use of the Content as defined by copyright law." So in an abundance of caution, if you'd like me to add a fair use tag, I'll do that. Hepburn is the only performer, male or female, to have ever won four Oscars for acting. That's more than decoration. That's film history. And that also makes the achievement notable, noteworthy and deserving of a photo. The Smithsonian, the US government's official historical repository and archive, clearly thought so too. X4n6 (talk) 21:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Slight misunderstanding I fear educational, and other non-commercial uses of the Contents is not wikipedia we requires that media is free for any purpose including commercial. So as has been said not in the public domain and not usable on Wikipedia without a fair use declaration and you have to convince others that it meet the ten criteria at WP:NFCC, I suspect that #8 may be a problem. MilborneOne (talk) 21:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the misunderstanding continues somewhat because you continue to assert the file is not in the public domain even while the applicable U.S. law states otherwise. Again, I've linked that law for you to review. Don't really know what else there is. As for your WP:NFCC issue regarding #8, I actually believe that's the easiest to resolve. Again, Hepburn's 4 Oscars represent a notable one-of-a-kind historical & cultural achievement. That's not my view exclusively. It's the Smithsonian's view - proved by the fact that they built an entire exhibit displaying the 4 Oscars and acknowledging the achievement. That is not decorative, nor is this photo illustrating what the article references. Suggest you read the Smithsonian's own description of the significance of the statutettes being displayed together. But I will add a fair use tag just so there is no question. X4n6 (talk) 07:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair use tag & rationale added. X4n6 (talk) 08:10, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As MilborneOne already said, this doesn't appear to meet NFCC #8 now that it has been tagged non-free. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The file now has a public domain tag as well as a fair use tag, which should be more than sufficient. NFCC #8 is addressed and satisfied within the fair use tag. The article makes significant and repeated mention of the achievement represented by the image. Also again, the Smithsonian Institute devotes an entire exhibition to the display of this image, and that itself flies in the face of any claim that the image is purely decorative. Perhaps non-American editors simply don't understand the significance of the Smithsonian's imprimatur. It is not conferred casually or capriciously. That U.S. government agency has more than aptly demonstrated the image is not decorative - but is historic. This important point remains undisputed. It's notability also remains indisputable. Deleting the image would substantially and unnecessarily weaken the very section of the article it illustrates and diminish the very achievement the article acknowledges. And would do so for no discernible or useful reason. X4n6 (talk) 21:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SillimanCollegeShield.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LD18 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Original versions uploaded were of too high a resolution, and are therefore a potential copyright violation, as the high resolution image could be used against the copyright holder's will. The image has also been orphaned until eventual deletion. LD18 (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probably just needs to be made even smaller rather than deleting. MilborneOne (talk) 10:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00776 JPG.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Tanbirahmed (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Only used in userspace, unencyclopedic due to lack of description, requested for two months. Acather96 (talk) 17:43, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 11:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beth Ditto Love Mag.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjiboi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free magazine cover being used just to make the point given person was on the cover. Damiens.rf 17:44, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Lean to keep. I think the pic does more than that: it shows how she was portrayed on the cover, in a very highly visible way that is not characteristic of singer-songwriters nor indeed of such plus-size women. So it's quite revealing of her public persona, in a way which I think does add something significant to the understanding readers get of her from the article. Jheald (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Jheald. Contributes significantly to the reader's understanding of how she chooses to portray herself and her plus-sizeness. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:27, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The pic show's her personality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.171.84 (talk) 23:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00855.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Boki92 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to bad quality. Acather96 (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree The file is a Public Domain picture. It does not break any policies and a use may be found for it at some point in time. Oddbodz (talk) 09:07, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:North Carolina's Republican Senator-elect Jesse Helms celebrates his 1972 victory.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjiboi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unecessary non-free image showing an important man at an important day on his life. Nevertheless, we don't need to see the image to get a perfect understanding of the event. Damiens.rf 17:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jesse Helms and President Ronald Reagan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Benjiboi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

If this image is really non-free, it's use fails NFCC#8. We don't need to see people meeting to understand they once met. Damiens.rf 17:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00868.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nicktarnow (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, possible copyright problems. Acather96 (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Clearly, this file has no source and rationale. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 17:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CP No Member.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file has no source and rationale. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 5.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This file has no source and rationale. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 7.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source and rationale. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 6.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source and rationale. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00880.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fielded (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject. Acather96 (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 4.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source and rationale. Not low resolution. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source and rationale. Not low resolution. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Club Penguin 2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Atum World (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

No source and rationale. Not low resolution. Fails WP:NFCC. JJ98 (Talk) 18:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

File:DSC00905.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Derek Sanderson (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic due to bad composition and low quality Acather96 (talk) 18:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how you can class this as unencyclopediotic as it is in use in an article. Oddbodz (talk) 09:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00914.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ethanholmes (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic, low quality Acather96 (talk) 18:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Userpage decoration for Redvers - Pictures.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Redvers (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

As I have transferred over all the old versions to commons, there is no longer any reason to keep it on English Wikipedia. Also, if I'm not mistaken, uploader is invoking WP:POINT as the only reason to keep on English Wikipedia, which is not a valid reason to keep. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00937.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Saska93 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to unidentifiable subject and low quality Acather96 (talk) 18:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Rehman 06:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00943.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Fitzy fitzy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphaned, and while the file page gives no description, the talk page describes him as an IT teacher who is looking for 'extra love'. Unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedily deleted: useless file, and attack file: this image and its surrounding commentary serves no encyclopedic purpose and is here only to mock somebody's prof. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 03:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitsuyasu Maeno with Plane.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dekkappai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unnecessary non-free image copied from a news paper, showing the subject of a bio. The article already contains an image of him (also non-free and also copied from a news paper...). Damiens.rf 19:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Too many images at Wikipedia. Text can adequately describe this image. ("A non-free image depicting a former BLP standing next to an airplane.") Also, I think Jimbo Wales has ruled that newspapers are not reliable sources if they print content unacceptable at Wikipedia. Dekkappai (talk) 22:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Closing admin should beware of snark. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Poor quality reproduction means the photo isn't very informative, even given the circumstances in which it was taken. Jheald (talk) 17:05, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eric Fleming.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dekkappai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

FindAGrave.com is not a valid source for images. The site's content is user provided and they don't care much about copyright. In any case, the image can no longer be found there. Nothing is know for sure about this image. We can't claim fair use. Damiens.rf 19:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete Image depicts a star of a Non-Notable old TV program the general Wikipedia user has never heard of. Move it to "Old-Nerd-apedia", "Cowboy fan-boy-a-pedia" or some such. Clearly inappropriate here. Dekkappai (talk) 22:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Dude, now I have to clear up all this sarcasm that seems to be just dripping from my screen! — BQZip01 — ^talk 14:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Closing admin should beware of snark. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Image source corrected [1], appears to be a non-free image with a fair use statement (although some of the stated reasons can be questioned). Copyright holder is probably the tv production company, do we need to know the actual copyright holder to use the image under fair use? MilborneOne (talk) 09:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as no viable reason for deletion has been made. In virtually every sourcing standard (MLA, Chicago, etc) it says to cite where you found it, not who owns the source. Again, you should have just asked politely for the uploader to put in the source instead of nominating it for deletion. While we need to update the name of the actual copyright holder, this person is deceased and we cannot post a new picture of him. "Nothing is know for sure about this image"? Really? It looks pretty clear to me from the caption that he is playing the part of Gil Favor in Rawhide. He was a primary actor (paired with Clint Eastwood) on the fifth-longest running western TV show in the US. If you spent even a moment to look at how it's used in the article and clicked the given hyperlink, you'd see that CBS clearly owns the copyright. Please try to perform even a modicum of research on it? This is one of those "frivolous nominations" people keep complaining about. — BQZip01 — ^talk 14:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Subject is dead. Identificatory image is appropriate. Identity has been confirmed. No prima-facie reason to suspect NFCC #2 problem. Jheald (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Subject being fairly dead would be a valid reason for declining a semi-speedy deletion referencing WP:NFC#UULP, but that's not what is being discussed here. Keep comments don't address whether this image meets the NFCC requirements. So, does this meet NFCC #8? I don't see it myself. "Here's a picture of an actor, best known for appearing in a 50s cowboy series, in cowboy getup". But only two clicks separate the reader from the IMDB page on Rawhide. And what's frivolous about this? There's no absolute entitlement or obligation to add eye candy showing what dead folks looked like. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:11, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm pretty sure no one here ever stated there is an "entitlement or obligation to add eye candy showing what dead folks looked like," but it is important to know what people looked like, especially if they are known for their visual appearance (like actors). The same would not be true for, say, a radio announcer. Yes, you can get to imdb and look at pictures in 2 clicks, but that means you have to search further for a simple image. While we want a free encyclopedia, we also want a quality encyclopedia. This is the exact reason we've made the NFCC in the first place. — BQZip01 — ^talk 14:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I would say that, even for a radio announcer, in the context of an article on them as an individual it is appropriate to show what they look like. This is part of the comprehensive information on them a bio should convey, if at all possible. That has long been the accepted understanding here. Jheald (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I've written a fair number of biographies-of-dead-people and never felt the need to add a non-free image. So you'll forgive me, I trust, if I disagree with you and BQZip01. Either things meet NFCC #8 or they don't. I don't see how this does. An image showing dead guy playing cowboy in B&W TV series doesn't add anything to the text "dead guy played a cowboy in B&W TV series". Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Disagree. An image showing what the subject of the article looks or looked like can generally be said to be adding something significant to the understanding given of the topic of the article (NFCC #8). Even some of the earliest drafts of our NFC policy have recognised that. I've certainly tried to source images for bios I've contributed to, admittedly mostly for live people, and would consider a bio of someone sufficiently publicly notable to pass WP:NOTABILITY to be incomplete without one. We are blocked from using fair-use images of the living by NFCC#1; but that doesn't apply to somebody who is dead. Jheald (talk) 17:22, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. We can't create a fair-use image because the subject is deceased. It's established that we can use fair-use images to identify dead people. DragonflyDC (talk) 11:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 08:26, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shōhei Imamura.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dekkappai (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free image copied from a news source. Damiens.rf 19:57, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete News sources are inherently unreliable (see above), even more so when they are used for data on the subjects BLPs, living or formerly so. Who has ever heard of this guy anyway? The article is probably a strong candidate for AfD. Dekkappai (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Closing admin should beware of snark. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep No indication of a valid reason for deletion. We can keep fair-use images from news sources. — BQZip01 — ^talk 14:48, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Subject is dead. Identificatory image is appropriate. Image does not appear to be tied to any special notable event or have any conspicuously special artistic value, so, on the face of it, no reason to suspect any particular NFCC #2 problem for a simple file image, even if it did come from a newspaper. Jheald (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.