Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 July 22

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-07-22 Edit

  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Keep an eye on this one, editor likely to remove template Acather96 (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Nothing on OTRS, reverted to clean, tagged for issues and will most likely PROD MLauba (Talk) 09:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Appears to have been recreated as a clean restart --MLauba (Talk) 09:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Acather96 (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. --Acather96 (talk) 08:59, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --VernoWhitney (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 09:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. --Acather96 (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Y Content forks, being dealt with through AFD.Acather96 (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Acather96 (talk) 09:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)


  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 09:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rewrite proposed, could someone with access to the ODNB verify that we're in the clear now? MLauba (Talk) 09:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK. Except for the final section on Eltham it derives from the DNB, and should have attribution {{DNB|Rich, Nathaniel (d.1701)}}. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Thank you, moved to main --MLauba (Talk) 10:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (Talk) 10:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]