Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitney Woerz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Woerz

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable singer lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. WP:TOOSOON. reddogsix (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-As stated, google news does show multiple independent sources (thought they are not highly credible). Other editors may please review and suggest. (Exploreandwrite (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:49, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:02, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - on one hand, she has toured nationally, one factor to show notability (assuming they're true), but on the other hand, there are no reliable sources. Bearian (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist . No !votes to gain consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 02:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete – It appears that about half of the sources (at least) are promo; article also appears to be promo. Absolutely no reason this article is needed here – doesn't pass any notability guidelines that apply (WP:GNG and WP:NMUSICs). Nom is correct that this is WP:TOOSOON. Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 23:19, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, her best song on youtube has 40 million views, second best 20 million, that is a lot. The refs and article give the impression she's a nobody but that isn't the case, I was half way to writing delete myself. Szzuk (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per at-least-modest coverage: [1] [2] [3] wumbolo ^^^ 22:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.