Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijayaditya I

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per the comment by Smmurphy (talk · contribs) who is now free to do what they recommended below. —SpacemanSpiff 10:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vijayaditya I

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article confuses between Chalukya dynasty and Shilaharas of Maharashtra Wiki tamil 100 (talk) 10:06, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Nominator is correct. This page should more or less be reverted to here, and a hatnote to Shilahara for information about the other Vijayaditya added. I would make this change, but I want to wait until someone else checks and confirms. Note that the two figures lived 300 years apart. Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:55, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in principle. This seems to be about the ruler of a substantial part of India. If someone has messed it up, the solution is to edit out the rubbish or split. I do not know the subject and cannot say more. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.