Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple-A season pages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 13:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Triple-A season pages

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since when do we have season pages for Triple-A? It's not the highest level of baseball in the country. This is a greater quantity of articles than I expected when I thought I'd only be nominating a few, but they are all real short and boiler plate. I haven't added these yet, but they should be included. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary pages with sparse information. Minor league seasons are not notable.. FYI..Plenty of more AAA season articles exist and a few AA ones also.. mostly created by the same user... see Category:International League seasons.Spanneraol (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- AA seasons too? Definitely gotta be included. I got distracted from listing the rest, and a little concerned I might be criticized for overloading this debate, but I'll add them. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What about all these. Penale52 (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I need to add those. Oy what a pain. Is there a max for how many articles should be in one AfD? I feel like I should do those separately just because of the sheer number. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge any encyclopedic content/Delete the rest. The articles have so little info that even a merge is questionable. Most only have the total number of wins and losses which could easily be put in a table in the main article on the team. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BASEBALL. Minor league seasons and players are not considered notable....William 01:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Minor league baseball persons are not presumed to be notable per WP:BASEBALL/N. Minor league baseball seasons are not presumed to be notable per WP:NSEASONS, and must be weighed by the criteria set forth there and at WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG. IMO, the overwhelming majority of, if not all, minor league baseball seasons fail those notability guidelines, and they are also deemed to be non-notable per the established consensus of WikiProject Baseball. Three strikes—yer out! Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in agreement with Dirtlawyer and others - minor leagues aren't notable. RedSoxFan2434 (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep just as teams can be notable although the individual players aren't so can seasons be notable when the individual players and games aren't. The WP:BASEBALL criteria are quite possibly too narrow, and saying something meets their criteria for deletion is not a reason for deletion. We have consistently accepted a somewhat broader range of minor leaguers than they would like. DGG ( talk ) 03:49, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Teams are certainly notable, but individual seasons in this case is certainly not. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 05:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.