Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Love Connection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Love Connection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough has been written about this album to provide sources for an article of substance. Notability is questionable. Vmavanti (talk) 23:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:40, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:41, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The album is mentioned in the following sources:1234567891011121314. Given the album's release date in 1979, it makes sense that a majority of these sources are older newspaper and magazine articles. Aoba47 (talk) 04:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep since there are multiple articles/reviews on the album. Aoba47 (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Multiple reviews in Google Books from the likes of Billboard (two reviews), Cadence, and Jazz magazine, so I'm struggling to see how the nominator determined that "not enough has been written about this album". --Michig (talk) 08:47, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.