Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Boyd (rugby league)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as a hoax- Peripitus (Talk) 21:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shane Boyd (rugby league)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can not find any reliable information on this person and suspect a hoax. It would be great if rugby-minded editors cross-checked common databases. Materialscientist (talk) 04:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obvious hoax as search on St Helens Heritage society's player database yields no results.Seasider91 (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per hoax. Cavarrone (talk) 02:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete does not appear in this list either, despite the claim of having scored 87 tries. The-Pope (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:HOAX --Artene50 (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear in any of the comprehensive databases for rugby league players. Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have to laugh at people reverting woodendick's edits and sending pompous messages to his talk page, when anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of the subject they're trying to edit would have instantly recognised it as utter nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.198.117.11 (talk) 04:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.