Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Parry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. — _Maggot^Syn 13:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Parry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable. Only mentioned by primary sources, his own website. Northwestgnome (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep notable journalist, played notable role in Iran-Contra scandal. Chimeric Glider (talk) 17:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, Polk Award winner and his Iran-contra reporting is acknowledged. Even if sources about him are slim there's enough to confirm major assertions and he he has sufficient recognition for an article. --Dhartung | Talk 19:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Times story just barely mentions him, and that is more sourcing than the article has had so far. Northwestgnome (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The Polk award is enough for me. His impact on Iran-Contra solidifies it. Definitely notable. Vickser (talk) 22:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He seems to be notable enough. However the article could use some work. Right now it is mainly a coatrack for his views. He left a successful career in mainstream journalism to edit a left-wing political blog. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.