Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhodell Brewery (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Peoria Warehouse Historic District. There is a clear consensus to delete, but redirects are cheap. bd2412 T 19:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rhodell Brewery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First AfD in 2006 was closed as no consensus. By today's standards, however, this is a clear WP:GNG / WP:NCORP fail. All news coverage is local to Peoria, with little to none outside the city, let alone outside the state. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Brewpubs are really not any more notable than a restaurant. The arguments in the first discussion for keep were really poor arguments such as all breweries are notable.--Rusf10 (talk) 04:34, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep plenty of coverage of this brewery including since the last deletion discussion. They moved into a large histpric building they rennovated with help from tax credits. Frequently covered as an important and significant feature of Peoria's Warehouse District resurgence. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment And what's notable about any of that? This is an encyclopedia, not a repository of corporate trivia. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- avertorially toned and fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Breweries are not inherently notable and coverage is local and / or routine, as in [1] from Peoria Journal Star. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete No coverage to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Sandals1 (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability criteria, no intellectually independent references, existing references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Article fails WP:SPIP, topic fails GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.