Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restore the Family for Children's Sake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:51, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restore the Family for Children's Sake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability under WP:GNG. This is a former, deregistered political party which unsuccessfully contested a negligible number of constituencies. Most of the sources on the page are either from the party itself or from election results. If it were a person, it would uncontroversially fail WP:NPOLITICIAN MB190417 (talk) 12:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MB190417 (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. MB190417 (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Nothing has happened since deregistration that improves notability. Blackguard 20:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per reasons provided. I tried a Google search for sources which might prove evidence of notability, but was unable to find anything substantial. The lack of sources on this party is unlikely to improve since deregistration. ToastButterToast (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.