Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Woodard (soccer coach)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Woodard (soccer coach)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

High school coach. won an award. no indication that the award is notable or the coach is either John from Idegon (talk) 18:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Indian Springs School, no independent notability. Giant Snowman 19:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Several sources listed in both external links and several mentions - enough to fill out a page and more unincluded at this time. Its removal would result in a net negative for Wikipedia. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds. Among his many awards, being nationally recognized as the Youth Soccer Coach of the Year (for Boys) by the United States Youth Soccer Association is more than sufficient for notability. (Also, I have improved the sourcing and layout of this article since it was nominated.) - Dravecky (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article is well referenced, meets WP:GNG. Nfitz (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.