Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN#April Fools nominations getting out of hand.  Sandstein  18:03, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Princess Celestia disapproves of this article. The lead image is horrible and the rest of the images show ponies being cruelly mistreated. Lack of cutie marks on all these images is something Twilight Sparkle and her friends severely criticise. All the text inside has been proven to be completely unreliable, a fact compounded by the appearence of unrecognised species in the images. In short, the editors must delete this page, or they will be banished to the moon! FreywaParcly Taxel
20% Cooler 05:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because magic makes it all complete. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing but a magnet for trolls and pedophiles. Carrite (talk) 05:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, in an odd bout of agreement with TPH, because I don't like ponies. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep because Fluttershy says so. -- 575Revolve 08:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable --SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 11:35, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a directory of young girl obsessions. Alternatively, rename to horse, really small and expand with exhaustive size data tables, sales figures, and arbitrary comparisons to other really small versions of normal animals. postdlf (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.