Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omni Consumer Products

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Omni Consumer Products

No citations to reliable sources to verify claims, to establish notability, or to offer real-world perspective (i.e. development and critical reception). --EEMIV (talk) 18:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Major institutions in major fiction will be sufficiently discussed to merit individual articles--or possibly combination articles with other similar ones. Wherever we put it, this is appropriate content for an encyclopedia. DGG (talk) 19:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Fictional major corporation that plays a crucial and predominant role in a major movie franchise, RoboCop. Needs cleanup. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 19:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for our own safety, they might send ED-209 after us. Seriously though, OCP was a major component in all the movies, video games, etc, but the article could certainly use some sources. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as per the aforementioned keep arguments. Adding some citations and tagged for rescue. --Pmedema (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Omni Consumer Products is involved in the Robocop to the level we may call it not only a character, but the main antagonist. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 22:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not establish notability of the topic in the real world. --Phirazo 20:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball keep per Wikipedia:Five pillars (notability to a real-world audience, consistent with a “specialized encyclopedia” concerning verifiable fictional topics with importance in the real world) and What Wikipedia is. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 04:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment There is a delete vote and the nom has not withdrawn, normal conditions of WP:SNOW or WP:SPEEDYKEEP have not been met. I see no reason not to let the debate run it's course for the normal 5 days. Beeblbrox (talk) 16:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A major character in a major film series, with sources available to establish notability. Alansohn (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.