Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nirmala B. Limaye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmala B. Limaye

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comparativley not enough papers to be notable DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 23:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a nom I can agree with. Publication list is short and not widely cited. Average academic qualifications. LotLE×talk 00:06, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can find no evidence (e.g. through heavily cited papers in MathSciNet or Google scholar) that this person passes WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Rather low citability in GScholar, WoS and MathSciNet (mostly in single digits), nothing else in the record indicates passing WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 03:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This professor fails it all. JBsupreme (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WoS shows 9 papers with citations 5, 2, 1, 0, 0,...Another unfortunate case of practically no impact. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]
fyi- Wikipedia article traffic statistics is another way of measuring popularity especially during afd process...Usually this number shoots up when in demand/in trouble. --DoNotTellDoNotAsk (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't meet WP:PROF. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.