Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Academic Centers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:08, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Academic Centers

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this article when reverting vandalism. Looking at it after my revert, I noticed that it was outrageously promotional, and started trimming - it quickly became apparent that there was no content that wasn't supported by either a press release republished in the local press, a Google search, or a dependent source. Checking for sources online, I could find nothing to indicate that this entity would pass WP:NCORP; therefore, delete. GirthSummit _(blether) 21:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 21:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit _(blether) 21:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a tutoring center, not a school. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. John from Idegon (talk) 10:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 桜 c) 11:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As an alternative to deletion, I propose to Merge it into Henry Nicholas#Education, though there is not much to merge. The Centers are already mentioned there, and the only reason this is talked about at all seems to be the rich guy who founded it. Given the lack of reliable sources, I agree the Centers should not have their own article. PJvanMill (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sign this center is different from any other tutoring centers. Alex-h (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not significant enough to warrant merging. Dorama285 (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.