Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakh (Bible acronym)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:14, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nakh (Bible acronym)

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially a dictionary definition of an acronym with almost no usage. Moreover, "NaKh" is just a substring of the acronym "TaNaKh"––at most this subject deserves a sentence in the Hebrew Bible article, although I'm skeptical that there's even wide enough usage to justify that. See also WP:NEOLOGISM _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Hebrew Bible article already lists the books of Nevi'im (Prophets) and Ketuvim (Writing). Nakh is just another way of grouping these two into one program of study. Yoninah (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Very selective merge to Hebrew Bible: Like the nominator, I don't see it deserving more than a sentence at Hebrew Bible - but I am seeing enough usage (particularly in academic papers) to justify it as a search term to help those of us whose Hebrew is not up to recognising Hebrew-derived acronyms. PWilkinson (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing significant. One of the many acronyms. Sdmarathe (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. The lack of significant sources rule our merging. When we do not have sources for a text we do not dump it elsewhere; we delete it. -The Gnome (talk) 12:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.