Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Musa (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:16, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muslim Musa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cricketer who fails WP:NCRIC. Has not yet played a first-class/List A game, etc. U19 cricketers don't meet the notability threshold. Was tagged as a speedy as it's already been deleted recently, but declined by Nyttend. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 18:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 18:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 18:18, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per norm, U-19 cricketers fail WP:GNG and WP:NCRIC. Joseph2302 18:19, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. Agreed. DilMendis82 (talk) 14:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Blocked sock—UY Scuti ^Talk 14:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom as it fails WP:NCRIC.Blackhole78 ^{talk | contrib} 17:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and SALT as recreated, per nom --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 10:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. That edit summary from Nyttend is atrocious, if editors can't be civil they shouldn't be admins. IgnorantArmies (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- non notable sports figure and micro-stub article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:59, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.