Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murray Lee Smith (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:01, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Murray Lee Smith

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article should have been GONE in 2005, but no action was taken after the VfD held that year. Subject is entirely non-notable, in particular WP:NOTINHERITED applies. Nothing here at all worth merging, not sourced anyway, so delete. Safiel (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Me too. Freikorp (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I'm surprised this has survived; a new article of this ilk would surely go by CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 06:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability.--XANIA - ЗAНИA ^{Wikipedia talk |} ^{Wikibooks talk} 12:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I looked for an article on the Carter family as a possible redirect target, but although there is a Family of Barack Obama article, there don't generally seem to be articles on the family of presidents, and if there were, a brother-in-law would hardly be worth a mention. Boleyn (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rosalynn Carter, where he is already briefly mentioned. PWilkinson (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - How is closing & saying "should be merged somewhere" a sensible idea ? .... Not sure how on earth it survived in 05 but doesn't look that way now ... Anyway fails BIO & GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.