Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mukhtar Gusengadzhiyev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Vanamonde (talk) 05:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mukhtar Gusengadzhiyev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of his movie roles appear to meet WP:ENT, and neither is being in the Guinness Book of World Records. Coverage seems to be almost entirely about his arrest for possessing child pornography. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:29, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He doesn't seem to pass WP:ENT. He does have a lot of reliable source coverage, but as the nominator stated it all seems to center around his kiddie porn, which would be a WP:BLP1E issue but not enough to qualify him for WP:PERP. PohranicniStraze (talk) 13:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 07:25, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – He is a World Record Holder with company contracts. The article needs fixing and more expansion on the World Record, especially given that this is a poorly written article, but he's notable. This isn't a case of WP:BLP1E since it's the arrest and multiple facts about the world record. Redditaddict69 08:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep The pedo..ehem, actor's article...apparently he's even known in Nigeria, where news about his arrest was published, per my search. So I'll say keep it, but not too very convinced we should. Antonio Nene Chulo Martin (whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaattt????) 11:20, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment The majority of his coverage, as you mention, concerns his arrest, not any other claims to notability. Per WP:PERP, notability for committing a crime normally comes if: the victim is famous (no indication that this is true); or the motivation or execution of the crime is unusual enough to be a well-documented historic event. This second criteria doesn't seem to apply, as it sounds like he is just a run-of-the-mill child porn aficionado, if there is such a thing. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:35, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.