Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milestone (aircraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete—clear consensus based on the proper policies and guidelines in this case. — Deck iller 23:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Milestone (aircraft)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very strange, unencyclopedic "article". Seems redundant, as everything here could be (and probably is already) covered in Aircraft or other core articles surrounding that topic. Stonemason89 (talk) 22:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment. My first reaction was to redirect to Product lifecycle, but this one is just as bad! East of Borschov 23:15, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone totally rewrites it and changes the title to "stages in aircraft development" or "aircraft development process" or some such thing. Probably not worth doing. --MelanieN (talk) 01:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a how to guide, and if you have the money and talent to build an aircraft, do you really need a how to guide from Wikipedia? Useless, unencyclopedic, ect. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced OR in any case, not notable. --Nuujinn (talk) 22:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.