Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Snupe (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Meek Mill#Dream Chasers Records. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 13:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Snupe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced biography of a rapper, with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC as his only releases were mixtapes. This is extremely poorly written, further — I can't, for example, make heads or tails of what the article is even trying to say about why Sean Combs is linked in it. As always, a Wikipedia article is not something that any musician — living or dead, rapper or rocker or country star or whatever — is automatically entitled to have just because he existed; it's something that a musician earns by being the subject of enough coverage in reliable sources to verify that they pass one or more of the notability criteria in NMUSIC, but this article fails to provide any evidence that its subject does so. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Meek_Mill#Dream_Chasers_Records per the previous discussion, As he's already mentioned there it makes more sense to redirect than delete IMHO –Davey2010^Talk 00:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010 Per my comment below about the salting, would you agree? SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister - Unless it's been recreated 3 or times then I don't usually go for Salting but If you and the closing admin prefer salting then I don't mind, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Insufficient coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability under WP:GNG. Fails WP:NMUSIC. - SummerPhD^v2.0 15:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect and salt and possibly edit lock if started again as my searches found nothing to suggest improvement and notability here and here. The most notable thing was he got a deal but was killed, there's nothing more to add. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After looking at this, it seems sensible enough to salt as there's nothing more to add and if there's ever the marginal chance, it can be unprotected but for the meantime, no. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.