Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Beard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Beard

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He lacks the significant independent coverage to meet the GNG and I don't see any other notability standards that he meets.Sandals1 (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC) Sandals1 (talk) 17:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:45, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage of him doesn't meet WP:GNG or any other notability criteria. Notability is not inherited from famous boxers he might have worked with. Papaursa (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 02:08, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete as per nominatorPRehse (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.