Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligence Node

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligence Node (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass NCORP. Most of the sources used are just press releases, opinion blogs or articles written by company founders. Funding reports fall under routine coverage and are insufficient to demonstrate notability. M4DU7 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 11:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article with a history of WP:SPA development, describing a company's changing business model, funding and sales figures, and setting out their product wares. Several of the provided sources are press releases which have been given bylines to their PR contact. The industry awards which are listed for their products do not appear inherently notable. Searches find coverage of studies by the firm,but these fail WP:CORPDEPTH. There is also a 2016 Times of India piece covering this and other e-commerce startups ([1]). Overall, I don't think there is enough WP:RS coverage to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 10:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above; quite clear that a lot of time has gone into this but the subject itself is not notable and, as above, it does not pass NCORP Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.