Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huma Abedin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 15:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huma Abedin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does an aide to the First Lady meet notability? No. Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps not inherently notable just for being a political aide, and many aides are not notable. However, she is the subject of many independent media stories in her own right, some of which are referenced in the article. Moreover, coverage is not just election campaign gossip but concerns her political influence and other topics. Therefore Keep. 192.100.124.156 (talk) 12:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is very easily significant coverage in reliable sources. I think it quite possible for a prominent political aide to meet the general notability guideline --Mkativerata (talk) 19:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Important player at the State Department. --AStanhope (talk) 02:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver seren^C 22:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver seren^C 22:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added some other sources. She is clearly notable from the multiple amounts of coverage in news sources. Silver seren^C 22:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG w/o difficulty. Ray^Talk 22:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.