Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy Petty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Primefac (talk) 18:05, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy Petty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. No significant coverage from reliable sources, chart impact, or critical attention. Sources cited in the article only include routine coverage and passing mentions. — Newslinger talk 16:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• According to the description of the image in the infobox, the band has performed for "Digital Brands", which is a company that the article creator is affiliated with. The article creator has also repeatedly spammed links for that company's websites throughout Wikipedia. (See the COI noticeboard discussion and the spam blacklist archives.) The photographer's name in the picture's description (Steven H. Keys) is a close match to the article creator's username (Steevven1). — Newslinger talk 13:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added WP:COI notices to Heavy Petty and Talk:Heavy Petty. — Newslinger talk 13:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 16:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 16:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources are just routine announcements of performances. If this subject (and the two others with the same name--see lede--) have a place on wikipedia at all I would suggest redirect to the legacy section of the Tom Petty page. ShelbyMarion (talk) 19:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At a minimum, the NPR interview in the External Links section would seem to indicate significant coverage. Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 15:14, 31 July 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Steevven1 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

• Note to Steevven1 ^(Talk). FYI, the heading in the external link you cited is misleading. WUFT-FM NPR is not NPR, rather it is a college radio station that partners with NPR for selected content. Other station content is locally produced and broadcast to the University of Florida's surrounding communities, including this 5-minute interview with the subject. Also note from the references: another local station, WJCT, which also partners with public broadcast content, is also listed. If you still want to i-vote keep--which is fine--it should be because they were interviewed by WUFT and WJCT local radio. It is not the same as being featured on NPR as one might normally consider when assessing significant coverage. ShelbyMarion (talk) 20:30, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, and thanks for the clarification. I would still vote to keep. Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 13:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom –Redditaddict_6_9 02:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.