Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Mercer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 22:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Mercer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG; seems to be WP:1E. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years. Pinging those who have looked at it snotability before: Good Olfactory, Fourthords. Boleyn (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - GNG is satisfied and the BLP-1E objection overcome by the fact that she has received coverage for her "Global Hope" NGO. See, for example, THIS in Christianity Today. Carrite (talk) 06:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Carrite -- as noted, she's notable for more than one event. Bearian (talk) 20:05, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.