Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Why the hell wasn't this speedied? -- Steel 22:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-verified and non-verifiable supposed micronation Pseudomonas 20:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Leave it alone let lewis have his fun x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.1.215 (talk • contribs)
• Speedy Delete. Absolute hoax. Isn't there a speedie for that sort of thing? ju66l3r 20:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I tried to speedy, but it was replaced by prod, which the original author deleted. Sorry to waste everyone's time with this. Pseudomonas 20:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Someone has declared xyr bedroom to be a micronation, and not informed anyone apart from Wikipedia. There is no evidence that this micronation exists anywhere outside of this Wikipedia article. It is unverifiable. The author writes on Talk:Hamland that "we want to let the world know about" the micronation and that xe has "a problem with the ones who would like to take the information on this counrty away from the members of the english speaking public of the world". Wikipedia is not a soapbox for letting the world know about something, and if merely deleting this article from a tertiary source "takes the information away" from the world, then the knowledge didn't exist outside of Wikipedia in the first place and this is original research. Delete. Uncle G 22:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Pavel Vozenilek 22:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, absolutely fails WP:V. It's a shame there's no speedy category for blatant hoaxes, but WP:DUH! and WP:SNOW seem to apply. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Most readers of Wikipedia are American and therefore don't speak English (or at least don't spell it correctly... I mean, seriously, 'color'?!??!!?!?!). Therefore by his logic Wikipedia is the wrong place to put this. Dave 22:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.