Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurudwara Shri Jyoti Saroop Sahib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Fatehgarh Sahib#Places of worship. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 23:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gurudwara Shri Jyoti Saroop Sahib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This gurudwara is not a notable place of worship. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I added some references. I think that notability is now demonstrated. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 20:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • You fail to show WP:SIGCOV (addresses the topic directly and in detail). 4 news-articles name-dropping the site as one of the many sites of an annual pilgrimage tour do not make it. TrangaBellam (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – There seem just passing mentions about this gurudwara in reliable sources. So redirection to List of gurdwaras#Punjab or some other suitable page seems like the best WP:ATD. We can easily sum up the sourced details about it in a line or two at the list article. Anyway, I will look again for sources in a day or two. - NitinMlk (talk) 22:30, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 10:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.