Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA World Rankings Yearly Top 10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FIFA World Rankings Yearly Top 10

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by IP, no reason given. Original rationale was that this article violates WP:LISTCRUFT and is likely WP:OR - that remains valid. That sentiment has even been echoed by the article creator, however I did not feel comfortable proceeding with CSD G7. Giant Snowman 09:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 10:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. -- MarshalN20 ^Talk 13:25, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems too random to me. -Koppapa (talk) 08:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom, seems like an unnecessary fork from the overall world ranking article. Fenix down (talk) 08:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.