Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F1 2010 (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn . Non-admin closure. MuZemike 00:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

F1 2010 (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:CRYSTAL — Dædαlus ^Contribs 05:13, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The video game is notable. That matters. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep WP:CRYSTAL does not forbid articles on future releases or events, merely unfounded speculation and guesswork. Every item in the article seems to be adequately sourced in reliable publications and official sources. --Canley (talk) 07:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Agree with above. Darth Newdar ^talk 07:05, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The video game is really notable. Cybervoron (talk) 10:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As per User:Canley. Cs-wolves(talk) 14:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw - per Canley.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 20:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.