Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald G. Martin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close This was literally closed 4 days ago. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Martin (public affairs) If you think it was closed incorrectly, then you can discuss it with the closing admin or take it to DRV, but you don't restart an AFD 3 days after an AFD closes simply because you do not like the decision. Especially as the final verdict was a landslide in favor of keeping.---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 01:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a regionally known real estate developer and public relations consultant. This is the second AfD nom for this article and several editors have worked tirelessly to clean it up to Wikipedia standards, but language that is designed to neutralize the article is consistently reverted by new unknown editor after editor. Several people involved in the creation of the article are known to be close in some way to the subjuct and the subject of the article himself has been very vocal about what language is kept or discarded. The biography of the individual nonetheless lists his various development projects, who funded them, available square footage, builder and occupiers of office space and finally websites designed to advertise the properties. Sources are sketchy in some cases and references have not been easy to verify. The section on the subject's business, Don Martin Public Affairs includes an exhaustive list of corporate clients, though the article is not about the business, but the man. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]

Delete Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 01:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.