Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep in My Heart (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ...Baby One More Time. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deep in My Heart (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has nothing. It is almost empty, it has like four irrelevant lines, and it doesn't have references. The article must be deleted beacause of its irrelevance and beacuase it is unnecessary Fortunato luigi (talk) 20:23, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I have no opinion on whether this article should be kept or deleted, but I must point out that no valid reason for deletion has been presented by the nominator. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:59, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to ...Baby One More Time. While "irrelevant" sounds a bit like you don't like it and unreferenced/"almost empty" are content issues and not reasons to delete, I can't find evidence it charted or otherwise passes WP:NSONG. liquidluck✽talk 02:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to ...Baby One More Time, the parent album. It appears to fail WP:NSONGS, as I'm not finding any "significant coverage" for this song in independent reliable sources.  Gongshow ^Talk 05:40, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.