Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Thomas Roberts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Note: the AFD was created 22 September but the nomination was not signed until 28th so it has had a week. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 14:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Thomas Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet notable guidelines for Musician, strictly promotional, resume in structure, unable to find secondary sources, not enough content to warrant an article at WP Maineartists (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:15, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree this seems promotional, but he was interviewed on All Things Considered which is more legit than many RS that pass muster in these musician AfD's, but it appears to be the only thing so it's probably not enough. ShelbyMarion (talk) 20:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete interviews do not add to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The Library of Congress article on the History of Ragtime specifically names him as an important exponent of the genre. See here. The All Things Considered program was an hour long interview of him on NPR. He's also the author of multiple articles in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, so he's a pretty important academic/musicologist. (see one example [1]) 4meter4 (talk) 01:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:ANYBIO #2, WP:CREATIVE #1. // "interviews do not add to notability" – what happened to "significant coverage" (WP:SIGCOV)? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Good to know. Then it's just a very poorly written article about a rather significant BLP. Will adjust accordingly to update content. Thanks. Maineartists (talk) 11:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.