Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronic Logic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chronic Logic

Chronic Logic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A seemingly non-notable company that fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Checking WP:VG/RS, the company is mentioned in WP:PASSING in a small handful of sources, but there is nothing akin to significant coverage. The only thing that mentions the name twice is this interview, which is mostly about Alex Austin and as an interview also would not count towards notability. Don't be fooled by the many GamesIndustry.biz and GameZone articles, they are all press releases. IceWelder [] 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [] 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [] 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.