Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles William Ledbetter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles William Ledbetter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, non-notable Tuskegee Airman created by an SPA, source analysis follows:

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
http://logicalthinker2.tripod.com/Tuskegeeaircraft.html	blog about the planes flown by the Tuskegee Airmen	blog	about the planes flown by the Tuskegee Airmen, not him	✘ No
https://gravelocator.cem.va.gov/index.html?cemetery=N901	unable to assess, dead link	unable to assess, dead link	unable to assess, dead link	✘ No
https://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c81j9h4r/			Two sentences about him	✘ No
https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ213/PLAW-109publ213.pdf			Law relating to the award of the Congressional Gold Medal not about him	✘ No
https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/pe/name/charles-ledbetter-obituary?id=27758512	Apparently published by The Press Enterprise but unclear who actually wrote it	unclear who actually wrote it, reads like a death notice published by his family or the funeral home		✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Mztourist (talk) 08:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 09:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't meet GNG. I don't even think there's enough reliable information here to do a merge. His WW2 unit is not indicated in any sources (the online finding aid from the California archives source lists subjects but no specific information...which means he might just have had an article clipping or ten about the fighter squadrons). Intothatdarkness 17:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Topic lacks sufficient coverage to meet BASIC and sufficient individual distinction to meet ANYBIO. Avilich (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.