Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celeste (pornographic actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 03:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celeste (pornographic actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested. This article cites precisely no biographical sources, as none exist. The sources cited are directories, mainly the unreliable kind (ones that maintain the kayfabe of the porn world). I think that the total budget for all her "films" would probably buy a day's filming on a real movie, but that's not the point, the complete lack of independent reliable biographical sources is. Guy (Help!) 14:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Passes PORNBIO with award wins. The sources cited are reliable to verify the awards won because they come from the awarding organisation; not sure how they maintain kayfabe when she actually won the awards. Current biographical sources are difficult to locate online considering her one-name status and since she was a performer of the 90s and actually retired in 1995 with movies of hers still being released afterwards. Stub status is fine. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - She appears quite notable to not be deleted. Keep as stub. Cavarrone (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Porn awards are like crackerjacks -there's one in every box. Does not meet WP:GNG, no significant coverage. Risker (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Morbidthoughts. Numerous sources, two awards, contract girl for an exclusive major studio. Dismas|^(talk) 08:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:ANYBIO with the award wins, plus the logic Morbidthoughts lays out. Tabercil (talk) 12:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.