Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caio Henrique Siqueira Sanchez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 03:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Caio Henrique Siqueira Sanchez

[Hide this box]New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about footballer who has only played semi-professionally except for a 25-minute appearance in the Serbian SuperLiga. There is no online Portuguese-language coverage of this footballer other than database entries, match reports and transfer announcements (and nothing at all which would be in-depth coverage). Although having played in a few minutes in a fully-pro league match creates a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL, there is a long-standing consensus that when an article comprehensively fails WP:GNG as this does, the presumption isn't valid. Jogurney (talk) 15:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 15:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If Sanchez meets our inclusion criteria for footballers they are ludicrously broad and need to be reconsidered, which is clearly the case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the 25 minute cameo should in no way compensate for the fact that this completely fails GNG Spiderone 18:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - comprehensive failure of GNG is far more important than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current sources doesn't indicate how he passes WP:GNG Sliekid (talk) 09:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.